首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Social innovation for bridging societal divides: Process or leader? A qualitative comparative analysis
【24h】

Social innovation for bridging societal divides: Process or leader? A qualitative comparative analysis

机译:弥合社会鸿沟的社会创新:过程还是领导者?定性比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study builds on literature about inclusive growth, social innovation, and collaborative leadership, and uses case studies of alumni of the Asian Institute of Management's (AIM) Bridging Leadership program to build frameworks for understanding the role of social innovation (SI) in bridging societal divides (BSD), and the role of the bridging leader (BL) in implementing BSD initiatives. The study examines two process variables: Stakeholder engagement (SE) and formalization, and three leadership variables: Formal authority, formal influence, and personal experience, and their effect on BSD activities. This study combines a deep qualitative review of case studies with the use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to develop configurations that result in positive impact of BSD activities. The study concludes that process variables appear the most in configurations that achieve positive outcomes. This result means that training and education on process tools can lead to successful BSD initiatives. Formal authority and formal influence both play roles in success configurations. The article also provides brief descriptions of case studies illustrating each of the three success configurations. These results have significance for policy makers, managers, educators, and researchers. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究基于关于包容性增长,社会创新和协作领导力的文献,并使用亚洲管理学院(AIM)的“桥接领导力”计划的校友案例研究来构建框架,以理解社会创新(SI)在桥接社会责任中的作用。分歧(BSD),以及桥接领导者(BL)在实施BSD计划中的角色。这项研究考察了两个过程变量:利益相关者参与(SE)和形式化,以及三个领导变量:形式权威,形式影响力和个人经验,以及它们对BSD活动的影响。这项研究结合了对案例研究的深入定性审查和定性比较分析(QCA)的使用,以开发导致BSD活动产生积极影响的配置。研究得出结论,过程变量在实现积极成果的配置中出现最多。这一结果意味着对过程工具的培训和教育可以成功推动BSD计划。正式的权威和形式的影响都在成功配置中发挥作用。本文还提供了案例研究的简要说明,说明了三种成功配置中的每一种。这些结果对决策者,管理者,教育者和研究人员具有重要意义。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号