• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Research >Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: Private versus collective benefits of social capital
【24h】

Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: Private versus collective benefits of social capital

机译：联盟伙伴之间和内部的知识转移：社会资本的私人利益与集体利益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article examines the process through which multilevel network structures translate into knowledge acquisition from alliance partners. The degree of knowledge transfer a multidivisional company achieves from its network of alliance partners is determined not only by the organization's external network structure, but also by the structure of relationships among its business units. By distinguishing two perspectives on the distribution of social capital's benefits - private versus collective - this article's approach reconciles the competing views on what types of network structures create social capital, that is, the brokerage and closure views of the social network literature. Private benefits of brokerage and centrality are more beneficial in interfirm networks, whereas collective benefits provided by network closure and low levels of centralization are more beneficial in intrafirm networks.
机译：本文研究了多级网络结构转化为从联盟合作伙伴获取知识的过程。跨部门公司从其联盟伙伴网络中获得的知识转移程度不仅取决于组织的外部网络结构，还取决于其业务部门之间关系的结构。通过区分社会资本利益分配的两种观点（私人的与集体的），本文的方法调和了关于哪种类型的网络结构创造社会资本的竞争观点，即社会网络文献的经纪人观点和封闭观点。在公司间网络中，经纪人和中央集权的私人利益更有利，而在公司内部网络中，由网络关闭和低水平的集中化提供的集体利益更为有利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号