...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chinese political science >The Pandemic and the Transformation of Liberal International Order
【24h】

The Pandemic and the Transformation of Liberal International Order

机译:大流行与自由主义国际秩序的转变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In 2018, 43 leading International Relations scholars in the United States signed a public statement in support of an urgent call to preserve the current international order, triggering heated scholarly debates. The idealized form of the liberal international order was criticized by many scholars for its chronic problems, including the contradictions between proclaimed liberal values and illiberal behaviors, the inability to reform its institutional pillars to accommodate the diverse group of emerging powers, and the tensions between the defenders of this order and its challengers. These problems became fully exposed under the external shock caused by the coronavirus pandemic. As the coronavirus spreads globally and disrupts the world's political, economic, and social fabric, several forces that have gained momentum and strength during the last decade are now converging as a formidable force that may reconfigure the post-pandemic international order. This paper addresses three significant challenges to the foundations of the current liberal order: (1) the entrenchment of authoritarianism, characterized by authoritarian resilience, autocratization, and the consolidation of competing authoritarian political-economic models; (2) the exacerbation of nationalism enabled by nationalist and populist politicians; and (3) the intensified competition among major powers. China has played mixed roles in the process of reconfiguring the current order. It challenges the mythologized liberal international order and exposes the contradictions in the dominant Western model, while promoting an alternative hybrid political-economic model. The shock brought by the pandemic has provided ample opportunities for China to extend its networks and expand international space for its model.
机译:2018年,美国43个领先的国际关系学者签署了一份公开陈述,以支持紧急呼吁保留当前的国际秩序,触发加热的学术辩论。自由主义国际秩序的理想形式受到许多学者的批评,因为许多学者为其长期存在批评,包括宣布的自由主义价值观和非凡行为之间的矛盾,无法改革其机构支柱,以适应各种新兴力量,以及之间的紧张局势这个秩序的捍卫者及其挑战者。这些问题在冠状病毒大流行引起的外部冲击下完全暴露。随着冠状病毒在全球范围内传播并破坏了世界政治,经济和社会面料,在过去十年中遭受了势头和力量的几个力量现在将作为可能重新配置大流行后国际秩序的强大力量。本文对目前的自由秩序的基础提出了三项重大挑战:(1)威权主义的根深蒂固,特点是由专制责备,专制,以及竞争授权政治经济模式的整合; (2)民族主义和民粹主义政治家使民族主义的加剧; (3)主要权力的加强竞争。中国在重新配置当前秩序的过程中发挥了混合作用。它挑战了神话化的自由主义国际秩序,在促进替代混合政治经济模型的同时暴露主导西方模式的矛盾。大流行带来的震撼为中国提供了充足的机会,扩大其网络并为其模式扩大国际空间。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号