...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Have cities effectively improved ecological well-being performance? Empirical analysis of 278 Chinese cities
【24h】

Have cities effectively improved ecological well-being performance? Empirical analysis of 278 Chinese cities

机译：城市是否有效地改善了生态幸福感？中国278个城市的实证分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

With the advent of the era of global ecological limits, natural capital has become absolutely scarce. How to improve the level of human well-being within the ecological limits is the ultimate goal of sustainable development. China is challenged to improve ecological well-being performance (EWP), predominantly in urban areas. This paper presents an overall analysis of the EWP of 278 Chinese cities during the period of 2005-2016 using the Super-slack-based measure (Super-SBM) model. The index system of ecological well-being performance evaluation is constructed from the perspective of input (e.g., labour force, fixed assets investment) and output (e.g. per capita GDP and dust). The results demonstrate that (1) the average EWP value of Chinese cities is relatively low with the value of 0.5919; (2) the top three performers in EWP are Sanya, Haikou and Shenzhen, and the bottom three performers are JinChang, Guigang and Baiyin; (3) the average EWP value of 278 Chinese cities achieved significant improvement over the period 2005-2016; and (4) the EWP value is relatively high in the eastern region, medium in the western region and low in the middle region. Policy suggestions are thus proposed for improving the EWP in Chinese prefecture-level cities. The research findings provide significant references for urban ecological protection and human well-being improvement in China. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：随着全球生态极限时代的到来，自然资本已变得绝对稀缺。如何在生态极限内提高人类的福祉水平是可持续发展的最终目标。中国面临着主要在城市地区提高生态福祉表现（EWP）的挑战。本文使用基于超松弛的测度（Super-SBM）模型对2005年至2016年中国278个城市的EWP进行了全面分析。从投入（例如劳动力，固定资产投资）和产出（例如人均GDP和粉尘）的角度构建生态幸福绩效评价指标体系。结果表明：（1）中国城市平均EWP值较低，为0.5919; （2）EWP的前三名是三亚，海口和深圳，后三名是金昌，贵港和白银; （3）2005年至2016年期间，中国278个城市的平均EWP值有了显着改善; （4）EWP值在东部地区较高，在西部地区中等，在中部地区较低。因此，提出了改善中国地级市EWP的政策建议。研究结果为中国城市生态保护和人类福祉的改善提供了重要参考。 （C）2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号