• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Comparative analysis of rating systems in developing and developed countries: A systematic review and a future agenda towards a region-based sustainability assessment
【24h】

Comparative analysis of rating systems in developing and developed countries: A systematic review and a future agenda towards a region-based sustainability assessment

机译：发展中国家和发展中国家评级制度的比较分析：系统审查与未来议程，以基于地区的可持续性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study aims to review and compare different rating systems of developed and developing countries to identify less focused aspects in terms of holistic sustainability. For this purpose, the study first identified and classified rating systems into two types (international or equivalent and local), which are being implemented by developed or developing countries. Second, it explored most common methods for the establishment of rating systems. Third, it compared international and local rating systems by analyzing their overall characteristics, average scores, assessment criteria and categories. The results have shown major differences between international and local rating systems in terms of holistic sustainability. While some international rating systems paid more attention to categories related to environmental sustainability, other local rating systems paid more attention to categories related to social and economic aspects. The results also indicated that the applicability of sustainability assessment cannot be solely achieved by international rating systems' adaptations. From the results, it can be concluded that the establishment of region-based rating systems with a full consideration of sustainability issues of a particular country is needed as a pivotal step forward to provide a responsive region-based sustainability assessment. The systematic review and comparative analysis performed in this study can provide valuable insights based on which international and customized rating systems can be revised to be more responsive for developing countries. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：本研究旨在审查和比较发达国家和发展中国家的不同评级系统，以确定整体可持续性方面的较少集中的方面。为此目的，该研究首先将评级系统分为分为两种类型（国际或当地），由发达国家或发展中国家实施。其次，它探讨了建立评级系统的最常见方法。第三，它通过分析整体特征，平均分数，评估标准和类别来比较国际和地方评级系统。结果在整体可持续性方面表现出国际和地方评级系统之间的重大差异。虽然一些国际评级系统更多地关注与环境可持续性有关的类别，但其他地方评级系统更多地关注与社会和经济方面有关的类别。结果还表明，可持续性评估的适用性不能仅通过国际评级系统的适应来实现。从结果中，可以得出结论认为，需要全面考虑到特定国家的可持续性问题的基于区域的评级系统，这是向前态度提供响应区的可持续性评估。本研究中进行的系统审查和比较分析可以提供有价值的见解，基于哪些国际和定制的评级系统可以修改，以对发展中国家更加响应。 （c）2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号