• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conflict and Security Law >Operationalizing the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ and Conflict Prevention: Dilemmas of Civilian Protection in Armed Conflict
【24h】

Operationalizing the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ and Conflict Prevention: Dilemmas of Civilian Protection in Armed Conflict

机译：实施“保护责任”和预防冲突：武装冲突中平民保护的困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The responsibility to protect is a nascent, highly contentious concept. Although a restrictive understanding of the concept was agreed upon by world leaders in 2005, the perspective of conflict prevention reveals the conceptual gap in terms of its scope, stage, and strength, failing to bridge the gulf between rhetorical support for prevention and tangible commitment to international action. It is argued that this commitment gap can be bridged by exploring the basis and boundaries of the legal responsibility that encompasses the transcending nature of the responsibility to prevent and react at the operational level. The reach of legal responsibility to protect can be defined by drawing on the existing rules of international law relating to the protection of civilians. While such an extension of the legal responsibility to protect can be appreciated as furthering the agenda of conflict prevention, the marriage of the two concepts appears to be destined to failure, causing normative, operational and ethical dilemmas. It will be suggested that a Human Protection Council be established as an alternative ‘right authority’ in order to resolve or mitigate those dilemmas by separating the responsibility to protect civilians from the Security Council's primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security.
机译：保护的责任是一个新生的，有争议的概念。尽管世界各国领导人在2005年达成了对该概念的限制性理解，但预防冲突的观点揭示了在概念，范围，阶段和力量方面的概念差距，未能弥合对预防的言论支持和对预防的切实承诺之间的鸿沟国际行动。有人认为，可以通过探索法律责任的基础和界限来弥合这一承诺差距，法律责任包括在业务一级预防和作出反应的责任的超越性质。可以通过参考有关保护平民的现行国际法规则来确定保护的法律责任范围。可以将保护法律责任的这种扩展视为进一步促进预防冲突的议程，但两个概念的结合似乎注定要失败，从而造成规范，业务和道德两难困境。建议建立一个人类保护理事会，作为替代的“权利机构”，以通过将保护平民的责任与安全理事会维护国际和平与安全的主要责任分开来解决或减轻这些难题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Conflict and Security Law》 |2009年第2期|p.209-241|共33页
  • 作者

    Hitoshi Nasu*;

  • 作者单位

    *Lecturer in law, The Australian National University. I express my gratitude to Professor Donald R. Rothwell for his invaluable comments. E-mail: NasuH{at}law.anu.edu.au.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号