...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conflict and Security Law >Self-defence, Anticipatory Self-defence and Pre-emption: International Law's Response to Terrorism
【24h】

Self-defence, Anticipatory Self-defence and Pre-emption: International Law's Response to Terrorism

机译:自卫,预期自卫和先发制人:国际法对恐怖主义的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article makes the distinction between self-defence, anticipatory self-defence and pre-emption. It argues against pre-emption. In the presence of article 39 of the Charter the case for pre-emption is not convincing and the current international legal order can deal effectively with the threat of terrorism. The article argues that certain acts of terrorism may amount to an armed attack, hence necessary and proportionate force may be used after meeting the outlined criteria.
机译:本文对自卫,预期自卫和先占进行了区分。它反对先发制人。在《宪章》第三十九条面前,先发制人的理由令人信服,而目前的国际法律秩序可以有效地应对恐怖主义的威胁。该文章认为,某些恐怖主义行为可能构成武装袭击,因此在达到概述的标准后,可以使用必要的和相称的武力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Conflict and Security Law》 |2007年第1期|95-126|共32页
  • 作者

    Niaz A. Shah;

  • 作者单位

    Niaz A. Shah is a Lecturer in Law School of Law University of Hull UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号