...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Contaminant Hydrology >Comparison of first-order analysis and fuzzy set approach for the evaluation of imprecision in a pesticide groundwater pollution screening model
【24h】

Comparison of first-order analysis and fuzzy set approach for the evaluation of imprecision in a pesticide groundwater pollution screening model

机译:农药地下水污染筛选模型不精确性评估的一级分析和模糊集方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The results of a screening model are always approximate, lying within an imprecision range. This paper for uses first on various types of imprecision in such modelling results, introduced either by subjective or state--of the--art estimates of coefficients or through measurement error, and second on the different types of methods able to take into account imprecision in the input parameters in order to evaluate imprecision in the simulation results. Emphasis is placed on the evaluation of imprecision in potential groundwater contamination by pesticides using the Attenua- tion Factor (AF) index, the Retardation Factor (RF) index and two different methods of uncertainty analysis' the classical first--order uncertainty analysis and a method based on the fuzzy set approach as an illustration of the basic ideas. The results of this comparison show that the fuzzy set approach is more suitable for evaluating imprecision in screening models than the classical technique. Furthermore, it furnishes a mean value imprecision range and adds a degree of confidence to this range.
机译:筛选模型的结果始终是近似的,处于不精确的范围内。本文首先在这种建模结果中使用各种类型的不精确性,通过对系数的主观估计或状态估计或通过测量误差引入,其次使用能够考虑不精确性的不同类型的方法在输入参数中,以评估仿真结果中的不精确性。重点放在使用衰减因子(AF)指数,延迟因子(RF)指数和两种不同的不确定性分析方法(经典的一阶不确定性分析和a)来评估农药对地下水潜在污染的不精确性。以模糊集方法为基础的方法作为基本思想的例证。比较结果表明,与经典技术相比,模糊集方法更适合于评估筛选模型中的不精确性。此外,它提供了平均值的不精确范围,并为该范围增加了置信度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号