...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of contemporary European studies >Russian and Western scholarly perspectives on EU-Russia relations in Justice and Home Affairs: how 'indigenous' is the Russian scholarship?
【24h】

Russian and Western scholarly perspectives on EU-Russia relations in Justice and Home Affairs: how 'indigenous' is the Russian scholarship?

机译：俄罗斯和西方对欧盟与俄罗斯在司法和内政方面的关系的学术观点：俄罗斯的奖学金有多“本土”？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The paper explores the state of academic dialogue between the Russian and Western scholarly communities studying the European Union (EU)-Russia relations in Justice and Home Affairs (JHA). By analyzing the citation patterns of the academic articles on the EU-Russia cooperation in this area, we arrive at the conclusion that the Russian scholarship mostly does not engage in a transnational academic dialogue with the Western counterparts. In other words, it has turned into a sealed 'indigenous' scholarly community. And what is more, it is also disintegrated within itself since the Russian scholars do not refer to the research produced by their compatriots either. To qualitatively substantiate our findings, in the last section of the paper, we review the universe of all articles written on the topic in Russian to distinguish five trends typical of the research published in Russian academic journals. We believe that these features are the result of the lack of engagement with the Western scholarship and simultaneously the cause which prevents the communication between the two scholarly communities. This, in turn, undermines the accumulation of the transnational multifaceted policy-relevant expertise essential for normalizing the relations between Brussels and Moscow in general and in JHA in particular.
机译：本文探讨了研究欧盟与俄罗斯司法和内政关系（JHA）的俄罗斯和西方学术界之间的学术对话状况。通过分析有关欧盟-俄罗斯在这一领域合作的学术论文的引文模式，我们得出的结论是，俄罗斯的奖学金大多不参与与西方同行的跨国学术对话。换句话说，它已变成一个密封的“土著”学术团体。而且，由于俄罗斯学者也没有参考同胞的研究，因此它也被分解了。为了定性地证实我们的发现，在本文的最后一部分，我们回顾了所有用俄语撰写的有关该主题的文章，以区分在俄罗斯学术期刊上发表的五项典型研究趋势。我们认为，这些特征是缺乏与西方学术界互动的结果，同时也是阻止两个学术界之间交流的原因。反过来，这破坏了跨国多方面的与政策相关的专业知识的积累，这些知识对于规范布鲁塞尔和莫斯科之间，特别是在JHA之间的关系至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号