...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of contingencies and crisis management >Network Governance in Response to Acts of Terrorism: Comparative Analyses
【24h】

Network Governance in Response to Acts of Terrorism: Comparative Analyses

机译：应对恐怖主义行为的网络治理：比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As Nairn Kapucu sees the many different parties involved in crisis management after a terrorist attack as a virtual organization, unsurprisingly, in Network Governance in Response to Acts of Terrorism he departs from network theory. This is why scholars like Klijn and Koppenjan - scholars from the field of Public Administration who have written extensively on network management - contribute heavily to his theoretical framework. Kapucu analyzes six cases, in six different countries -The United States, Indonesia,Turkey, Spain, the UK and India - on four dimensions, to find out what the differences were in the way their network governance functioned in the aftermath of terrorist attacks. These dimensions are the emergency management system, the environment in which collaborative decision-making took place, organizational capacity and the actors and their (lack of) trust and interoperability. He also does a network analysis for all of his cases.
机译：奈恩·卡普库（Nairn Kapucu）认为，恐怖袭击后参与危机管理的许多不同方都是虚拟组织，毫不奇怪，在《应对恐怖主义行为的网络治理》中，他偏离了网络理论。这就是为什么像Klijn和Koppenjan这样的学者（来自公共管理领域的学者，他们在网络管理方面写了很多篇文章）对他的理论框架做出了重大贡献。卡普库（Kapucu）在四个维度上分析了六个不同国家（美国，印度尼西亚，土耳其，西班牙，英国和印度）的六个案例，以了解恐怖袭击后其网络治理运作方式的差异。这些方面包括应急管理系统，进行协作决策的环境，组织能力以及参与者及其（缺乏）信任和互操作性。他还对所有案件进行了网络分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号