...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of contingencies and crisis management >Towards Resilient Rotterdam? Key conditions for a networked approach to managing urban infrastructure risks
【24h】

Towards Resilient Rotterdam? Key conditions for a networked approach to managing urban infrastructure risks

机译：朝向弹性鹿特丹？建立城市基础设施风险的网络方法的关键条件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

Critical infrastructures are increasingly recognized to be playing important roles in urban resilience theory and practice. However, little is known about which governance challenges result from making them an integral part of urban resilience policies and what role city administrations play or could play in the resulting governance arrangements. We address these shortcomings in the scholarly literature by analysing the case of the Dutch city of Rotterdam, which has positioned itself as a front runner with regard to urban resilience. We find that the city administration is limited in its authority and depends on decisions made by other public and private actors, particularly those relating to the integrated management of interconnected infrastructure networks such as those for water and energy provision. We therefore argue that institutionalizing resilience will strongly depend on city administrations' institutional capacity to manage networks more effectively. For this, we derive key conditions for institutional adjustments in current governance arrangements. Necessary adjustments include redefining roles and responsibilities for cross-territorial risk management, cross-sectoral and cross-departmental budgeting of resilience measures, and integrating local actions and measures with those at regional and national levels of government. Our conclusions call for national and supranational legal reforms to establish uniform procedural rules for urban risk management and contingency planning to provide guidance for municipalities on how to enhance the resilience of their cities and infrastructures.
机译：越来越受到关键基础设施越来越认识到在城市弹性理论和实践中起重要作用。然而，众所周知，这一治理挑战使其成为城市恢复性政策的一个组成部分以及在所产生的治理安排中发挥或可以发挥作用的角色。我们通过分析荷兰鹿特丹的案例，在学术文学中解决了这些缺点，该鹿特丹将自己定位为城市恢复力。我们发现，该市管理局的权威有限，依赖其他公共和私人行为者所作的决定，特别是与互联的基础设施网络综合管理有关的决定，例如水和能源拨备。因此，我们争辩说，制度化恢复力将大力取决于城市主管部门的机构能力，更有效地管理网络。为此，我们推出了当前治理安排中的机构调整的关键条件。必要的调整包括重新定义跨领土风险管理，跨部门和跨部门预算的责任措施，并将当地行动和措施与区域和国家政府一级的跨境措施进行整合。我们的结论呼吁国家和超法法律改革，为城市风险管理和应急计划建立统一的程序规则，为如何提高各城市和基础设施的恢复性提供指导。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号