首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Crime and Justice >Getting technical: parole officers' continued use of technical violations under California's parole reform agenda
【24h】

Getting technical: parole officers' continued use of technical violations under California's parole reform agenda

机译:提高技术水平:假释人员在加州假释改革议程下继续使用技术侵权行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How do parole officers manage technical violations in an organizational environment where technical violations are not supported by management? Using ethnographic data collected during three years (1300 hours) of fieldwork with California parole officers (POs) from 2003 to 2006, this paper considers how POs manage technical violators after the initiation of a rehabilitation-focused reform that encouraged POs to avoid violating parolees for technical/administrative violations except in the most egregious or troublesome cases. Data analysis suggests that POs often viewed this reform negatively and responded with various resistance strategies to continue violating parolees. Resistance tactics included: (1) partnering with police; (2) piling charges, and (3) using paperwork enhancement strategies. Officers felt these strategies better met community safety goals by assuring lengthy revocation sentences or increasing the likelihood of new crime prosecution. These findings have implications for the effectiveness of reform implementation and the success of prisoner reentry initiatives.View full textDownload full textKeywordsparole, prisoner reentry, organizational change, discretionary decision making, technical violationsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.677572
机译:在组织不支持技术违规的组织环境中,假释人员如何管理技术违规?利用从2003年至2006年与加利福尼亚假释官员(PO)进行的三年(1300小时)实地调查收集的人种学数据,本文考虑了在以康复为重点的改革开始后,POs如何管理技术违规者,鼓励POs避免违反假释规定。技术/行政违规行为,除非是最严重或最麻烦的情况。数据分析表明,邮政官员经常对这项改革持消极态度,并以各种抵抗策略做出回应,继续违反假释规定。抵抗策略包括:(1)与警察合作; (2)打桩费用,以及(3)使用文书工作强化策略。官员们认为,通过确保较长的撤销判决或增加新的犯罪起诉的可能性,这些策略可以更好地达到社区安全目标。这些发现对改革实施的有效性和囚犯再入举措的成功具有影响。查看全文下载全文关键词假释,囚犯再入,组织变革,自由裁量决策,技术违规相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact ::“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.677572

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号