【24h】

HALDANE'S GAMBIT

机译:哈丹的游戏圈

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article considers the body of work which Andrew Haldane has published since the onset of financial crisis. It draws a distinction between two kinds of criticism in that work: Haldane's interference through political arithmetic on the costs of finance and Haldane's big concept of the financial network using metaphors drawn from the life sciences. His readers have mainly focused on Haldane's innovation through concept and network metaphor while neglecting his political arithmetic and empirics on the costs of finance. But this article argues that Haldane's political arithmetic on costs is an important radical intervention when the finance sector is deflecting reform with a trade narrative about the social benefits of finance.View full textDownload full textKeywordsAndrew Haldane, financial reform, financial regulation, financial crisis, knowledge limits, financial networkRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2011.609696
机译:本文考虑了自金融危机爆发以来安德鲁·霍尔丹(Andrew Haldane)发表的著作。它在这项工作中的两种批评之间进行了区分:霍尔丹通过政治算法对金融成本进行干预,以及霍尔丹使用生命科学中的隐喻对金融网络进行了大规划。他的读者主要关注Haldane通过概念和网络隐喻的创新,而忽略了他关于财务成本的政治算术和经验。但是本文认为,当金融部门通过对金融社会效益的贸易叙事来偏向改革时,霍尔丹的成本政治算术是一项重要的根本干预。查看全文下载全文限制,财务网络相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布日期:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b” };添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2011.609696

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号