...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Digital Imaging >Can the Documented Patient Briefing Be Carried Out with an iPad App?
【24h】

Can the Documented Patient Briefing Be Carried Out with an iPad App?

机译：可以使用iPad App进行有案可查的患者情况介绍吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To evaluate the feasibility of an iPad-based documented patient briefing for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examinations. A standard briefing sheet and questionnaire for a MRI scan was converted from paper form into an iPad application. Twenty patients, who had been referred for an MRI scan, were briefed about the examination in paper form as well as via the iPad application before performing the MRI scan. Time each patient needed for the briefing and the number of questions that came up were documented. Patients’ acceptance of the electronic briefing was assessed using a questionnaire. The mean processing time was 2.36 min (range 0.58 to 09.35 min., standard deviation ±2.05 min) for the paper-based briefing and 4.15 min (range 1.56 to 13.48 min, SD ± 2.36 min) for the app-based briefing. Concerning technical aspects, patients asked two questions during the app-based briefing; no questions arose during the paper-based briefing. Six patients preferred electronic briefing and four patients, the paper-based form. No patient preferred the electronic form with additional multimedial information. Eight participants did not mind which briefing version was used; two participants did not express their preference at all. Our experiences showed that electronic briefing using an iPad is feasible and has the potential to become a user-friendly alternative to the conventional paper-based approach. Owing to the broad range of the results, a follow-up study will seek to determine the influencing factors on processing time and other potential questions.
机译：为了评估基于iPad的患者简报进行磁共振成像（MRI）检查的可行性。用于MRI扫描的标准简报和调查表已从纸张形式转换为iPad应用程序。在进行MRI扫描之前，向20位接受MRI扫描的患者简要介绍了纸质检查以及通​​过iPad应用程序进行的检查。记录每位患者简报所需的时间和提出的问题数量。使用问卷调查评估患者对电子简报的接受程度。纸质简报的平均处理时间为2.36分钟（范围为0.58至09.35分钟，标准偏差为±2.05分钟），而基于应用程序的简报的平均处理时间为4.15分钟（范围为1.56至13.48分钟，SD±2.36分钟）。关于技术方面，患者在基于应用程序的简报中问了两个问题。纸质简报中没有任何问题。六名患者首选电子简报，四名患者采用纸质表格。没有患者喜欢带有附加多媒体信息的电子表格。八位参与者不介意使用哪个简报版本；两名参与者根本没有表达自己的偏好。我们的经验表明，使用iPad进行电子简报是可行的，并且有可能成为传统纸质方法的一种用户友好替代方法。由于结果的广泛性，后续研究将寻求确定影响处理时间和其他潜在问题的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号