...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Digital Imaging >Non-Clinical Errors Using Voice Recognition Dictation Software for Radiology Reports: A Retrospective Audit
【24h】

Non-Clinical Errors Using Voice Recognition Dictation Software for Radiology Reports: A Retrospective Audit

机译：使用语音识别听写软件进行放射学报告的非临床错误：回顾性审核

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this study is to ascertain the error rates of using a voice recognition (VR) dictation system. We compared our results with several other articles and discussed the pros and cons of using such a system. The study was performed at the Southern Health Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Melbourne, Victoria using the GE RIS with Powerscribe 3.5 VR system. Fifty random finalized reports from 19 radiologists obtained between June 2008 and November 2008 were scrutinized for errors in six categories namely, wrong word substitution, deletion, punctuation, other, and nonsense phrase. Reports were also divided into two categories: computer radiography (CR = plain film) and non-CR (ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine, and angiographic examinations). Errors were divided into two categories, significant but not likely to alter patient management and very significant with the meaning of the report affected, thus potentially affecting patient management (nonsense phrase). Three hundred seventy-nine finalized CR reports and 631 non-CR finalized reports were examined. Eleven percent of the reports in the CR group had errors. Two percent of these reports contained nonsense phrases. Thirty-six percent of the reports in the non-CR group had errors and out of these, 5% contained nonsense phrases. VR dictation system is like a double-edged sword. Whilst there are many benefits, there are also many pitfalls. We hope that raising the awareness of the error rates will help in our efforts to reduce error rates and strike a balance between quality and speed of reports generated.
机译：这项研究的目的是确定使用语音识别（VR）听写系统的错误率。我们将我们的结果与其他几篇文章进行了比较，并讨论了使用这种系统的利弊。这项研究是在维多利亚州墨尔本的诊断影像南部卫生部门使用带有Powerscribe 3.5 VR系统的GE RIS进行的。在2008年6月至2008年11月之间，从19位放射科医生那里随机抽取了50份最终定稿报告，对其中6个类别的错误进行了审查，这些类别包括错误的单词替换，删除，标点，其他和无意义的短语。报告也分为两类：计算机射线照相（CR =平片）和非CR（超声，计算机断层扫描，磁共振成像，核医学和血管造影检查）。错误被分为两类，重要的但不太可能改变患者的管理方式，而影响报告意义的意义非常重大，因此潜在地影响了患者的管理（废话）。审查了三百九十九份最终报告，其中631份未完成。 CR组中有11％的报告有错误。这些报告中有百分之二包含废话。非CR小组中有36％的报告中有错误，其中有5％包含废话。虚拟现实听写系统就像一把双刃剑。尽管有很多好处，但也有很多陷阱。我们希望，提高对错误率的认识将有助于我们降低错误率，并在生成的报告的质量和速度之间取得平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号