• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Literature >Economic Theory and Experimental Economics
【24h】

Economic Theory and Experimental Economics

机译：经济理论与实验经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Economic theory and economic experiments can be combined to the benefit of both. By itself, this is a fairly uninformative "more is better" conclusion. There must be gains from considering experiments or theory more carefully when doing theory or experimentation. But what steps can we take to make it more likely that potential gains are realized? The danger with the concerns raised in this essay is that they might be used to apologize away any potential interaction between theory and experiments. It is unlikely that we will usefully combine theory and experiments if we too freely respond to contrasts between the two with such statements as: "The results appear to be at odds with the theory, but we have no obvious way to measure how far away they are, and by my preferred measure they are pretty close." "... but I suspect the subjects really perceived a different experimental protocol under which their behavior is consistent with the theory." "... but the theory is an approximation that cannot be expected to apply everywhere, and the discovery of this exception tells us nothing about the theory in other applications." How do we avoid working at such cross-purposes?
机译：经济理论和经济实验可以结合起来，以使两者受益。就其本身而言，这是一个毫无根据的“越多越好”的结论。在进行理论或实验时，必须更加仔细地考虑实验或理论，才能有所收获。但是，我们可以采取哪些步骤使更有可能实现潜在收益？本文中提出的担忧的危险在于，它们可能被用来道歉，以消除理论与实验之间的任何潜在相互作用。如果我们过于随意地用以下陈述来回应两者之间的对比，我们不太可能将理论和实验有效地结合起来：“结果似乎与理论不一致，但是我们没有明显的方法来衡量它们之间的距离是的，按照我的偏爱，它们非常接近。” “ ...但是我怀疑受试者真的感觉到了不同的实验方案，根据该方案他们的行为与理论相符。” “ ...但是理论是一个近似值，不能期望它在任何地方都适用，并且这种例外的发现并没有告诉我们关于该理论在其他应用中的任何信息。”我们如何避免跨领域工作？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号