Emotional Appeals and Moral Standards: Rhetorical Arguments in Court Cases

Mary L. Schuster

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of educational technology systems >Emotional Appeals and Moral Standards: Rhetorical Arguments in Court Cases

【24h】

Emotional Appeals and Moral Standards: Rhetorical Arguments in Court Cases

机译：情感诉求和道德标准：法院案件中的修辞论点

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

In this article, I analyze 73 circuit court opinions in which due process rights are weighed according to a little-known legal test called shocks the conscience . I also offer my observations of a federal trial in the U.S. district court in 2015 upon which the test was imposed. I reveal how requiring the shocks-the-conscience test confirms the authority of the state and silences those who have been singled out as individuals or as groups to be deprived of constitutional rights. In particular, professional communication scholars who examine emotional appeals as rhetorical strategies should find this article of interest.

机译：在本文中，我分析了73个巡回法院的意见，其中根据一项鲜为人知的法律测试（称为“震撼良心”）对正当程序权进行了权衡。我还提供了我对2015年在美国地方法院进行的联邦审判的看法，并对该判决进行了测试。我揭示了要求进行震撼力测试会如何确认国家的权威，并使那些被选为个人或团体被剥夺宪法权利的人保持沉默。尤其是，将情感诉求作为修辞策略研究的专业传播学者应该找到这篇感兴趣的文章。

著录项

来源
《Journal of educational technology systems》 |2019年第3期|279-308|共30页
作者
Mary L. Schuster;
展开▼
作者单位

Department of Writing Studies University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Minneapolis MN USA|Law School University of Minnesota-Twin Cities Minneapolis MN USA;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
law; power; emotional appeals; moral standards; legal arguments; rhetorical arguments; professional communication and activism;

机译：法;功率;情感诉求;道德标准;法律论点;修辞论据;专业的沟通和行动;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. APPEALS COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS OVER EPA'S CROSS-STATE STANDARDS [J] . Tamar Hallerman GHG reduction technologies monitor . 2012,第17期

机译：上诉法院对EPA跨州标准的争论
2. Appeals Court Oral Arguments over 800 MHz Band Center on Court's Jurisdiction to Review the Case [J] . Telecommunications Reports . 2008,第7期

机译：就法院管辖权的800 MHz频段中心的法院口头辩论提起上诉
3. The interaction between rational arguments and emotional appeals in the entrepreneurial pitch [J] . Fernandez-Vazquez Jose-Santiago, Alvarez-Delgado Roberto-Carlos International journal of entrepreneurial behaviour & research . 2020,第3期

机译：在创业间距的理性论点与情感上诉的互动
4. Great News for Indian Country: Recent Decisions by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court on Tribal Authority to Regulate the Environment [C] . David R. LaRoche Air Waste Management Association's Annual Conference Exhibition . 2002

机译：印度国家的伟大消息：美国巡回赛上诉法院和美国最高法院对部落权力的决定
5. Emotional Appeals in Nonprofit Advertising: A Rhetorical Analysis of Print Ads by the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation and the American Cancer Society [D] . Harrison, Dominique. 2020

机译：非营利组织广告中的情感上诉：由苏珊G. Komen乳腺癌基础和美国癌症协会的印刷广告的修辞分析
6. Using rhetorical appeals to credibility logic and emotions to increase your persuasiveness [O] . Lara Varpio 2018

机译：用言语表达对信誉逻辑和情感的诉求以增强您的说服力
7. The Function (or Malfunction) of Equity in the Charity Law of Canada’s Federal Courts: This essay explores what, if anything, it means for the Federal Court of Appeal to be a “court of equity” in the exercise of its jurisdiction over matters related to charitable registration under the Income Tax Act. The equitable jurisdiction over charities encompasses a number of curative principles, which the Court of Chancery traditionally invoked to save indefinite or otherwise defective charitable gifts. The author identifies some of these equitable principles and contemplates how their invocation might have altered the course of certain unsuccessful charitable registration appeals. She then considers the principal arguments for and against the Federal Court of Appeal applying these equitable principles when adjudicating matters related to registered charity status. [O] . 2016

机译：加拿大联邦法院《慈善法》中的平等职能（或失灵）：本文探讨了联邦上诉法院在行使对相关事宜的管辖权时成为“平等法院”的含义（如果有的话）根据《所得税法》进行慈善注册。对慈善组织的公平管辖权包括许多治疗原则，传统上，检举法院援引这些原则以保存无限期或其他有缺陷的慈善礼物。作者指出了其中一些公平原则，并考虑了其调用可能如何改变了某些不成功的慈善注册上诉的过程。然后，她在裁定与注册慈善身分有关的事项时，考虑支持和反对联邦上诉法院的主要论据，运用这些公平原则。
8. Deciding Cases Without Argument: An Examination of Four Courts of Appeals. [R] . D. Stienstra J. S. Cecil 1987

机译：无争议案件审理：对四个上诉法院的审查。

Emotional Appeals and Moral Standards: Rhetorical Arguments in Court Cases

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅