• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of educational technology systems >GEOPOLITICS OF GRANT WRITING: DISCURSIVE AND STYLISTIC FEATURES OF NONPROFIT GRANT PROPOSALS IN NEPAL AND THE UNITED STATES
【24h】

GEOPOLITICS OF GRANT WRITING: DISCURSIVE AND STYLISTIC FEATURES OF NONPROFIT GRANT PROPOSALS IN NEPAL AND THE UNITED STATES

机译：赠予的地缘政治：尼泊尔和美国的非牟利赠款提案的讨论性和风格特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study examines the global-local interplay of genre features in a select sample of nonprofit grant proposals from two particular sites-Nepal and the United States. Critically analyzing the carefully selected samples from both the sites on their own terms first and then in clusters (of Nepalese and American proposals) by exploiting the genre and discourse analysis theories and techniques published in genre, genre analysis, and grant proposal scholarship, this study attempts to examine the genre of nonprofit grant proposal in both comparative and non-comparative terms. While the study acknowledges that each instance of nonprofit grant proposal is unique, complex, and therefore non-generalizable, it does draw some broad generalizations about the similarities and differences in the rhetorical "moves," organization, and/or composition strategies of grant writers from these two different geopolitical locations. The study finds that variations observed across samples and grant writers reflect the unique rhetorical situations of these writers, whereas uniformities have to do with the global circulation of Western genre forms in the rest of the world via global organizations like the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund-which are also the major donors in developing countries like Nepal. And finally, the study reaffirms the fact that constraints like funding agencies' guidelines and reviewers' preferences have a considerable influence on genre features and forms. That has been the case with both the Nepalese and American proposals sampled in this study.
机译：这项研究研究了来自两个特定站点（尼泊尔和美国）的非营利补助提案的精选样本中流派特征的全球局部相互作用。通过利用在体裁，体裁分析和拨款提案奖学金中发表的体裁和话语分析理论和技术，首先以自己的术语对两个站点中精心挑选的样本进行批判性分析，然后再对这些样本进行聚类分析。试图从比较和非比较的角度研究非营利性赠款提案的类型。尽管该研究承认非营利性赠款提案的每个实例都是唯一的，复杂的且因此不可泛化，但确实对赠款作者的言辞“动作”，组织和/或组成策略的异同做出了一些广泛的概括。来自这两个不同的地缘政治位置。该研究发现，样本和赠款作家之间观察到的差异反映了这些作家独特的修辞情境，而统一性则与西方流派形式在全球其他地方通过联合国和国际货币组织等全球组织的全球发行有关。基金-也是尼泊尔等发展中国家的主要捐助者。最后，该研究重申了这样一个事实，即资助机构的指导方针和审稿人的偏好之类的约束对体裁特征和形式具有相当大的影响。本研究中抽样的尼泊尔和美国提案都是这种情况。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of educational technology systems》 |2014年第2期|141-170|共30页
  • 作者

    SANTOSH KHADKA;

  • 作者单位

    Composition & Cultural Rhetoric/The Writing Program Syracuse University 900 S. Crouse Ave. Syracuse, NY 13244;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号