• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of engineering and technology management >An empirical analysis of the role of reference point in justice perception in R&D settings in Korea
【24h】

An empirical analysis of the role of reference point in justice perception in R&D settings in Korea

机译：对韩国研发环境中正义感中参考点作用的实证分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study examines the relationship of the respondent's reference point with regards to distributive and procedural justice in an R&D setting in Korea. The two characteristics: (1) the rewards difference between Korean public and private R&D institutes (the outcome level at the public R&D institutes is much less than that at the private ones), (2) and the similarity of procedures being used to determine R&D professional's rewards at both types of research institutes, provide an excellent real-life setting for studying the role of reference point. To avoid common method variance, we measured distributive and procedural justice separately. Consistent with the previous experiments, R&D professionals at the public R&D institutes indicated differentiated distributive justice levels according to R&D professionals' reference points. Results also showed that the presence of a social comparison other (suggested reference point) leads the R&D professionals at public R&D institutes to perceive procedural injustice. Finally, several Theoretical and managerial implications were discussed.
机译：这项研究考察了韩国研发环境中受访者参考点与分配和程序正义之间的关系。两个特征：（1）韩国公立和私立研发机构之间的报酬差异（公立R＆D机构的成果水平远低于私立R＆D机构）；（2）以及用于确定R＆D的程序的相似性两种类型研究机构的专业人员奖励，为研究参考点的作用提供了一个极好的现实环境。为避免通用方法的差异，我们分别测量了分配正义和程序正义。与以前的实验一致，公共研发机构的研发专业人员根据研发专业人员的参考点指出了不同的分配司法水平。结果还表明，存在其他社会比较对象（建议的参考点）会使公共R＆D机构的R＆D专业人士感觉到程序上的不公正。最后，讨论了一些理论和管理意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号