Comparing Climate Policy Processes in India, Brazil, and South Africa: Domestic Engagements With International Climate Policy Frameworks

Prabhat Upadhyaya; Mathias Fridahl; Björn-Ola Linnér; Mikael Román

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environment & Development >Comparing Climate Policy Processes in India, Brazil, and South Africa: Domestic Engagements With International Climate Policy Frameworks

【24h】

Comparing Climate Policy Processes in India, Brazil, and South Africa: Domestic Engagements With International Climate Policy Frameworks

机译：比较印度，巴西和南非的气候政策程序：国内参与与国际气候政策框架

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Using policy cycle model as a heuristic, this article studies Indian, Brazilian, and South African engagement with Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) by (a) comparing NAMA policy process and (b) identifying factors driving or limiting the framework’s domestic application. India largely remained uninterested in NAMAs, Brazil aligned its domestic climate policy and NAMAs, while South Africa had a more nuanced engagement when formulating NAMAs. Four factors influenced these countries’ NAMA engagements: the level and necessity of international support, the availability of domestic policy provisions to tackle climate change, the domestic institutional capacity to coordinate interministerial functioning, and the role of individuals in the institutional apparatus. As an international climate policy framework, studying NAMA engagement provides learnings for nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement for designing the instrument, ensuring clarity on support provisions for ratcheting up ambitions, and enhancing institutional capacity, to expedite transition from policy formulation to implementation and beyond.

机译：本文以政策周期模型为试探法，通过（a）比较NAMA政策流程和（b）确定驱动或限制框架在国内实施的因素，研究印度，巴西和南非与国家适当缓解行动（NAMA）的互动。印度对NAMA基本上不感兴趣，巴西将其国内气候政策与NAMA保持一致，而南非在制定NAMA时有更细微的参与。四个因素影响了这些国家的NAMA参与：国际支持的水平和必要性，解决气候变化的国内政策规定的可用性，协调部际职能的国内机构能力以及个人在机构机构中的作用。作为国际气候政策框架，研究NAMA参与可以为《巴黎协定》下国家自主贡献的学习提供依据，以设计工具，确保明确旨在提高雄心的支持条款，并增强机构能力，以加快从政策制定到实施的过渡。。

著录项

来源
《Journal of Environment & Development》 |2018年第2期|186-209|共24页
作者
Prabhat Upadhyaya; Mathias Fridahl; Björn-Ola Linnér; Mikael Román;
展开▼
作者单位

Department of Thematic Studies – Environmental Change, Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Linköping University, Sweden;

Department of Thematic Studies – Environmental Change, Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Linköping University, Sweden;

Department of Thematic Studies – Environmental Change, Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Linköping University, Sweden;

Growth Analysis, Office of Science and Innovation, Brasília – DF, Brazil;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
policy process; climate policy; international policy frameworks; NAMAs; NDCs;

机译：政策过程;气候政策;国际政策框架;NAMA;NDCs;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Alternative Metrics for Comparing Domestic Climate Change Mitigation Efforts and the Emerging International Climate Policy Architecture [J] . Aldy Joseph E., Pizer William A. Review of environmental economics and policy . 2016,第1期

机译：比较国内减缓气候变化措施和新兴国际气候政策架构的替代指标
2. Mainstreaming biodiversity and wildlife management into climate change policy frameworks in selected east and southern African countries [J] . Kupika Olga L., Nhamo Godwell Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies . 2016,第3期

机译：将生物多样性和野生动物管理纳入南部非洲国家的气候变化政策框架主流
3. National Energy Policies and Energy Security in the Context of Climate Change and Global Environmental Risks: A Theoretical Framework for Reconciling Domestic and International Law through a Multiscalar and Multilevel Approach [J] . Paolo Davide Farah, Piercarlo Rossi European energy and environmental law review . 2011,第6期

机译：气候变化和全球环境风险背景下的国家能源政策和能源安全：通过多尺度和多层次方法协调国内法和国际法的理论框架
4. BRIC’d Up Energy Efficiency: Energy and Climate Policies in Brazil, Russia, India, and China [C] . Philip Mihlmeste, Donald Anderson, Sanjay Dube, Biennial ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings;ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings . 2010

机译：金砖四国提高能源效率：巴西，俄罗斯，印度和中国的能源和气候政策
5. Defining Climate Policy in Africa: Kenya's Climate Change Policy Processes [D] . Chin-Yee, Simon Matthew. 2018

机译：在非洲定义气候政策：肯尼亚的气候变化政策流程
6. Mainstreaming biodiversity and wildlife management into climate change policy frameworks in selected east and southern African countries [O] . Olga L. Kupika, Godwell Nhamo 2016

机译：在选定的东部和南部非洲国家将生物多样性和野生动植物管理纳入气候变化政策框架的主流
7. Home > All Content > Vol 50, No 1 (2019) Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development Cover Page Edited by: James Georgalakis and Pauline Rose June 2019 Volume 50 Issue 1 This issue aims to identify how partnerships focused on the production of policy-engaged research seek to achieve societal impact and explores the challenges in these processes. The collaborations analysed span academia, civil society and government, from the grassroots to the national and global levels. By locating these examples within the broader debates on interactions between researchers and research users designed to strengthen evidence informed decision making, this publication offers concepts and practices to inform those funding, designing and undertaking development research. The featured case studies are explored through the perspectives of both researchers and their partners in civil society and policy. They are predominantly taken from a diverse portfolio of research projects funded through the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Department for International Development (DFID) Strategic Partnership. A collaboration with the Impact Initiative, this IDS Bulletin is essential reading for all those in research organisations, development agencies and donors committed to the better use of evidence and learning for development. Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.100 ABSTRACT FULL ISSUE PDF Foreword Diana Dalton DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.102 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Introduction: Identifying the Qualities of Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development – A New Analytical Framework James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.103 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Rethinking Research Impact through Principles for Fair and Equitable Partnerships Kate Newman, Sowmyaa Bharadwaj, Jude Fransman DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.104 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Pathways to Impact: Insights from Research Partnerships in Uganda and India Rachel Hinton, Rona Bronwin, Laura Savage DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.105 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Exploring Partnerships between Academia and Disabled Persons’ Organisations: Lessons Learned from Collaborative Research in Africa Maria Kett, Mark T. Carew, John-Bosco Asiimwe, Richard Bwalya, Anderson Gitonga, Boakai A. Nyehn, Joyce Olenja, Leslie Swartz, Nora Groce DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.106 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Layered and Linking Research Partnerships: Learning from YOUR World Research in Ethiopia and Nepal Vicky Johnson, Anannia Admassu, Andrew Church, Jill Healey, Sujeeta Mathema DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.107 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Fundamental Challenges in Academic–Government Partnership in Conflict Research in the Pastoral Lowlands of Ethiopia Mercy Fekadu Mulugeta, Fana Gebresenbet, Yonas Tariku, Ekal Nettir DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.108 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Regional Research–Policy Partnerships for Health Equity and Inclusive Development: Reflections on Opportunities and Challenges from a Southern African Perspective [O] . Nicola Yeates, Themba Moeti, Mubita Luwabelwa 2019

机译：主页>所有内容> Vol 50，第1号（2019年）探索国际发展顾客的研究 - 政策伙伴关系：詹姆斯格拉巴拉斯和波雷琳上升2019年6月50卷第1卷这个问题旨在确定合作伙伴关系如何关注政策的生产。 - 繁殖的研究寻求实现社会影响并探索这些过程中的挑战。合作分析了跨度学术界，民间社会和政府，从基层到国家和全球层面。通过在研究人员和研究用户之间的相互作用的更广泛辩论中找到这些示例，旨在加强证据明智的决策，本出版物提供了通知这些资金，设计和开发研究的概念和实践。通过研究人员及其合作伙伴在民间社会和政策的角度来看，探讨了特色案例研究。它们主要从英国经济和社会研究委员会（ESRC）和国际发展部（DFID）战略伙伴部资助的各种研究项目组合中获取。与影响计划的合作，此IDS公告是研究组织，发展机构和捐助者致力于更好地利用证据和学习发展的所有人的重要阅读。探索研究 - 在国际发展中的研究 - 政策伙伴关系James Georgalakis，Pauline Rose Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.100 Abstract完整发行PDF前言戴安娜DALTON DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.102抽象PDFONLINE文章简介：确定国际发展中研究政策伙伴关系的质量 - 新的分析框架詹姆斯·乔治拉斯·罗琳·罗拉克斯：10.19088 / 1968-2019.103抽象Pdfonline文章通过公平和公平合作伙伴关系的原则重新思考研究影响凯特纽曼，Sowmyaa Bharadwaj，Jude Fransman Do：10.19088 / 1968-2019.104抽象Pdfonline文章途径影响：来自乌干达和印度Rachel Hinton，RONA Bronwin，Laura Bronwin的研究伙伴关系的见解：10.19088 / 1968-2019.105抽象的PDFonline文章探讨了学术界和残疾人士组织之间的伙伴关系：从非洲玛丽亚凯特的合作研究中吸取的经验教训。克鲁，约翰 - 博斯科阿斯蒂姆韦，理查德Bwalya，安德rson gitonga，Boakai A. Nyehn，Joyce Olenja，Leslie Swartz，Nora Groce Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.106 Abstract Pdfonline文章分层和链接研究合作伙伴关系：从您的世界研究中学习在埃塞俄比亚和尼泊尔Vicky Johnson，Anannia Admassu，安德鲁教堂的世界研究， JILL HEALELY，SUJETA MATHEMA DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.107抽象PDFONLINE文章在学术界政府伙伴关系中的基本挑战在冲突研究中埃塞俄比亚牧场的牧区牧场地区牧羊犬MULUGETA，宇瓦·塔利克（Ekal Nettir Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.108摘要PDFONLINE文章区域研究 - 健康股权和包容性发展的政策伙伴关系：关于南部非洲观点的机遇和挑战的思考

Comparing Climate Policy Processes in India, Brazil, and South Africa: Domestic Engagements With International Climate Policy Frameworks

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅