...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Are incentive programs working? Landowner attitudes to ecological restoration of agricultural landscapes
【24h】

Are incentive programs working? Landowner attitudes to ecological restoration of agricultural landscapes

机译：奖励计划有效吗？土地所有者对农业景观生态恢复的态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Private property accounts for much of the planet's arable land, and most of this has been cleared for agricultural production. Agricultural areas retain only fragments of their original vegetation and this has been detrimental to many native plant and animal species. Habitat restoration and revegetation may be able to reconnect and enlarge existing remnant areas in agricultural landscapes and, thereby, enhance native plant and animal communities. However, conservation initiatives will be successful only if landowners actively participate in restoration actions. This study used four hundred postal questionnaires to assess the degree to which landowners in two regions of south-eastern Australia adopt restoration activities, their opinions regarding remnant and revegetated land and their management actions in these areas. One hundred and seventy nine completed questionnaires were received. Three quarters of respondents had undertaken restoration on their property or were planning to revegetate in the future. Landcare members were most likely to have previously revegetated and future revegetation intentions were best predicted by previous restoration activities and a primary income source that was off-farm. Landowners were more likely to manage restored and remnant areas if they perceived threats such as weeds, pest animals and fire risk would be detrimental to their property, than to enhance environmental outcomes. These results indicate that landowners are interested in restoring natural areas, but without greater assistance to restore ground layers and manage perceived threats posed by fire and invasive plants and animals, restoration actions will not have their desired biodiversity benefits.
机译：私有财产占地球耕地的大部分，其中大部分已被许可用于农业生产。农业地区仅保留其原始植被的碎片，这对许多本地动植物物种都是有害的。生境的恢复和重新植被可能能够重新连接并扩大农业景观中现有的剩余区域，从而增强本地动植物群落。但是，只有在土地所有者积极参与恢复行动的情况下，保护举措才能成功。这项研究使用了四百张邮政调查表，评估了澳大利亚东南部两个地区的土地所有者采取何种恢复活动的程度，他们对剩余和重新植被土地的看法以及在这些地区的管理行动。收到179份完整的问卷。四分之三的受访者已对其财产进行了恢复或计划在未来进行植被恢复。 Landcare成员最有可能以前进行过植被恢复，而以前的恢复活动和非农业收入来源则可以最好地预测未来的植被恢复意向。如果土地所有者认为杂草，害虫和火灾等威胁对他们的财产有害，而不是增强环境后果，他们更有可能管理恢复的土地和残余区域。这些结果表明，土地所有者有兴趣恢复自然区域，但如果没有更大的援助来恢复地面层并管理火灾和入侵动植物造成的可感知威胁，恢复行动将不会获得其所需的生物多样性利益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Environmental Management》 |2013年第30期|69-76|共8页
  • 作者

    Sacha Jellinek; Kirsten M. Parris; Don A. Driscoll; Peter D. Dwyer;

  • 作者单位

    ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The NERP Environmental Decisions Hub, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville,VIC 3010, Australia;

    ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The NERP Environmental Decisions Hub, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville,VIC 3010, Australia;

    ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The NERP Environmental Decisions Hub, The Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia;

    Department of Resource Management and Geography, School of Land and Environment, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Landowner; Attitudes; Management actions; Agriculture; Restore; Revegetate; Remnant vegetation; Fire; Weeds; Pest animals; Fauna;

    机译：地主;态度;管理措施;农业;恢复;植被残留的植被;火;杂草;害虫动物;动物群;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号