...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Beyond buffer zone protection: A comparative study of park and buffer zone products' importance to villagers living inside Royal Chitwan National Park and to villagers living in its buffer zone
【24h】

Beyond buffer zone protection: A comparative study of park and buffer zone products' importance to villagers living inside Royal Chitwan National Park and to villagers living in its buffer zone

机译：超越缓冲区的保护：比较公园和缓冲区产品对居住在皇家奇旺国家公园内的村民以及对其居住在缓冲区内的村民的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Even after 30 years of strict de jure protection, today's de facto extraction of products from Nepal's Royal Chitwan National Park (RCNP) and their great economic importance to local households suggests that this reality should be explicitly internalised in managing this world heritage park. Several studies have quantified local people's use of protected areas and estimated the value of such areas to them. However, few studies incorporate economic analyses to investigate the effect of management interventions on local communities' resource use and collection behaviour. In Nepal, buffer zones and especially buffer zone community forestry are seen as means to define and demarcate places, where local people may legally extract goods that are either identical to or relevant substitutes for products that are collected in protected areas. The intention is to resolve park-people conflicts over resource use. This article presents the findings of an in-depth study of the importance of natural resources to the livelihoods of 18 households. One village was located inside RCNP with no realistic alternatives to Park resources, while the other is located in the buffer zone with equal distance to the Park, a national forest and their community forest. For each household, the collection of products, allocation of time, and purchase and sale of goods were recorded daily through 12 consecutive months and economic values were calculated on the basis of local market prices and recorded quantities. The study shows that products from RCNP are of great importance to the livelihoods of local people. Furthermore, we find that products collected in the national forest substitute products from the Park, while the substitution effect of the community forest is small. Accordingly, the study illustrates that, irrespective of buffer zone community forestry, there is still a gap between local people's need for supplementing natural resources and their rights to satisfy them on a legal basis, which is likely to be unsustainable in the longer term. This calls for a thorough evaluation of actual park-people relations and how these may be improved through local participation that goes beyond the current form of buffer zone community forestry and the admitted 7-14 annual days of open access grass cutting within the park.
机译：即使经过30年严格的法律保护，今天事实上从尼泊尔皇家奇旺国家公园（RCNP）提取的产品及其对当地家庭的巨大经济意义也表明，在管理这个世界遗产公园时，应该明确地体现这一现实。一些研究量化了当地人对保护区的使用，并估计了保护区对他们的价值。但是，很少有研究纳入经济分析来调查管理干预措施对当地社区资源使用和收集行为的影响。在尼泊尔，缓冲区，尤其是缓冲区社区林业被视为定义和划定地方的手段，当地人民可以合法地提取与在保护区收集的产品相同或相关的替代品。目的是解决公园人在资源使用方面的冲突。本文介绍了对自然资源对18个家庭的生计重要性的深入研究的结果。一个村庄位于RCNP内部，没有任何其他替代公园资源的选择，而另一个村庄位于缓冲区，与公园，国家森林及其社区森林等距。对于每个家庭，每天连续12个月记录产品的收集，时间分配以及商品的购买和销售，并根据当地市场价格和记录的数量计算经济价值。研究表明，RCNP的产品对当地人的生活至关重要。此外，我们发现国家森林公园替代产品中收集的产品，而社区森林的替代效果却很小。因此，该研究表明，无论缓冲区的社区林业如何，当地人对补充自然资源的需求与他们在法律上满足其权利的权利之间仍然存在差距，这从长远来看可能是不可持续的。这就要求对实际的公园与人之间的关系进行彻底的评估，以及如何通过当地的参与来改善这种关系，这种参与超出了目前的缓冲区社区林业形式以及公园内允许的7-14年开放采伐的天数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号