• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Response to 'Discussion of the paper 'Cost effective policies for alternative distributions of stochastic water pollution' by Gren, Destouni and Tempone' by Kampas and Adamidis
【24h】

Response to 'Discussion of the paper 'Cost effective policies for alternative distributions of stochastic water pollution' by Gren, Destouni and Tempone' by Kampas and Adamidis

机译：对Kampas和Adamidis的“讨论Gren，Destouni和Tempone的论文“讨论随机水污染的替代分配的成本有效政策”的讨论”的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The note by Kampas and Adamidis (2004; KA) argues for a series of limitations in the paper by [Gren, I.-M., Destouni, G., Tempone R., 2002. Cost effective policies for alternative distributions of stochastic water pollution. Journal of Environmental Management, 66, 145-157.]. We systematically go through and reply to the arguments made by KA, showing that they are all based on misunderstanding of the pollutant load quantities involved in the GDT study and of the scope and purpose of the study. Specifically, the KA arguments are critically based on the invalid assumption of log-normality in individual, basin-scale annual pollutant loads, which are the basic pollutant transport quantities involved in the GDT study. We show that GDT never made, or had physical reason to make any such assumption, whereby the following KA arguments become irrelevant.
机译：Kampas和Adamidis（2004; KA）的注释在[Gren，I.-M.，Destouni，G.，Tempone R.，2002中提出了一系列局限性。随机水的替代分配的经济有效政策污染。环境管理杂志，66，145-157。]。我们系统地审视并回答了KA提出的论点，表明它们全都是基于对GDT研究中涉及的污染物负荷量以及研究范围和目的的误解。具体来说，KA论证主要基于对单个盆地规模年度污染物负荷中对数正态的无效假设，这些假设是GDT研究中涉及的基本污染物运输量。我们证明，GDT从未做出过这样的假设，也没有物理上的理由做出任何这样的假设，因此以下KA参数变得无关紧要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号