• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >An assessment of household willingness to pay for curbside recycling: A comparison of payment card and referendum approaches
【24h】

An assessment of household willingness to pay for curbside recycling: A comparison of payment card and referendum approaches

机译：评估家庭为路边回收支付的意愿：支付卡和全民投票方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Curbside recycling is a tool that communities use to reduce the need for landfill space. This study provides contingent valuation estimates of household willingness to pay (WTP) to continue a curbside recycling program in the face of budget cuts. Comparisons of two forms of the contingent valuation method (CVM) are provided: a single bounded referendum and a payment card. Neither approach emerges as unambiguously superior. Response rates were virtually identical. Both approaches show that support for curbside recycling is highly sensitive to price. Regression results from the payment card provided a more thorough identification of socio-demographic variables associated with WTP than the referendum, but the explanatory power of the two regressions did not differ significantly. The referendum estimates of mean WTP exceed those from the payment card, although the disparities are less than those typically reported in the CVM literature. Local policy makers cited the CVM results as influencing their decisions regarding funding options for the future of the program, and seemed to appreciate the fact that the two approaches provided a fairly narrow range of estimates of WTP. In an era when more of the burden of financing of environmental programs is being shifted to the local level, use of CVM to estimate the WTP of consumers for highly disaggregated goods and services designed to achieve environmental improvement will likely become more relevant to local decision makers who are interested in understanding their constituents' views.
机译：路边回收是社区用来减少对垃圾填埋空间需求的工具。这项研究提供了在面对预算削减的情况下，家庭继续支付路边回收计划的支付意愿（WTP）的或有估值估计。提供了两种形式的或有估值方法（CVM）的比较：单一有界公投和支付卡。两种方法都没有明显优势。回应率几乎相同。两种方法都表明，对路边回收的支持对价格高度敏感。与全民投票相比，支付卡的回归结果提供了与WTP相关的社会人口统计学变量的更全面的识别，但是两次回归的解释力没有显着差异。尽管差异远小于CVM文献中通常报告的差异，但平均WTP的全民投票估计值超过了支付卡上的估计值。当地政策制定者称CVM结果影响了他们对计划未来资金选择的决定，并且似乎很欣赏以下事实：这两种方法提供的WTP估算范围相当狭窄。在将更多环境计划资金负担转移到地方层面的时代，使用CVM估算旨在实现环境改善的高度分类商品和服务的消费者的WTP可能与当地决策者更加相关有兴趣了解其选民观点的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号