...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Sustainability evaluation based on the Three-dimensional Ecological Footprint and Human Development Index: A case study on the four island regions in China
【24h】

Sustainability evaluation based on the Three-dimensional Ecological Footprint and Human Development Index: A case study on the four island regions in China

机译：基于三维生态足迹和人类发展指数的可持续性评估 - 以中国四岛地区为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Sustainable development emphasizes the sustainability of natural resources and the environment as well as the development of social welfare. Under the background of resource scarcity and environmental constraints, maximizing social welfare is an inevitable choice to achieve sustainable development. Ecological Wellbeing Performance (EWP) can comprehensively reflect the efficiency of natural capital conversion into social welfare, and improving EWP is a feasible measure to achieve sustainable development. Moreover, island areas are the extremely complicated ecological-social-economic systems due to the traits that are geographical isolation, scarce resources, and frequent natural disasters, so that emphasizing the sustainability of island systems is a key step for achieving sustainable development goals. This study developed the EWP model based on the improved Three-dimensional Ecological Footprint (EF) and urban-scale Human Development Index (HDI), to synthetically evaluate and analyze the sustainable development of four major island regions in China with the data in 2017. Results found that: (1) The four regions are all in ecological deficits, being in exchange for overdraft natural capital for economic development. The EF_(depth) is greater than the original length 1 indicating the excessive consumption of the natural capital stock. The EF_(size) reflects the abundance and liquidity of regional natural capital, all the four regions are with the generally low level of flow capital utilization. Hainan with highest EF_(size) 0.428 is due to its comparatively sparse population density, abundant resources, and strong ecological capacity, while the relatively large population density and more restricted natural capital flows make Taiwan in the lowest value. (2) Judging from the evaluation results of the HDI, Chongming (0.796) and Hainan (0.773) high development level are relatively behind Taiwan (0.912) and Zhoushan (0.827) very high development level, for the impact of income is greater, that is, economic development in Hainan and Chongming is slightly weak. (3) Taiwan, with the highest EWP 3.646, shows the excellent natural resource utilization efficiency and sustainability, followed by Zhoushan, Chongming, and Hainan. In general, increasing HDI while reducing EF can be an ideal way to improve the efficiency of ecological resources and achieve sustainable urban development.
机译：可持续发展强调自然资源和环境的可持续性以及社会福利的发展。在资源稀缺和环境限制的背景下，最大化社会福利是实现可持续发展的必然选择。生态福祉表现（EWP）可以全面反映自然资本转换为社会福利的效率，改善EWP是实现可持续发展的可行措施。此外，由于地理孤立，稀缺资源和自然灾害频繁的特征，岛屿地区是极其复杂的生态社会经济系统，因此强调岛屿系统的可持续性是实现可持续发展目标的关键步骤。本研究开发了基于改进的三维生态足迹（EF）和城市规模人类发展指数（HDI）的EWP模型，综合评价和分析了2017年数据中的四大岛屿地区的可持续发展。结果发现：（1）四个地区全部处于生态赤字，换于经济发展透支自然资本。 EF_（深度）大于原始长度1，表明自然资本库存过度消耗。 EF_（尺寸）反映了区域自然资本的丰富和流动性，所有四个地区都具有普遍较低的流动资金利用水平。海南拥有最高EF_（尺寸）0.428是由于其相对稀疏的人口密度，丰富的资源和强烈的生态能力，而人口密度相对较大，自然资本流量的较大程度较低，以最低的价值制作台湾。 （2）从HDI的评估结果判断，崇明（0.796）和海南（0.773）高开发水平相对台湾（0.912）和舟山（0.827）的发展水平非常高，因为收入的影响更大，即是，海南和崇明的经济发展略微薄弱。 （3）台湾拥有最高的EWP 3.646，展示了出色的自然资源利用效率和可持续性，其次是舟山，崇明和海南。一般来说，增加了HDI，同时减少了EF，可以是提高生态资源效率并实现可持续城市发展的理想方式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Environmental Management》 |2020年第jul1期|110509.1-110509.12|共12页
  • 作者

    Xinyi Long; Huajun Yu; Mingxing Sun; Xue-Chao Wang; Jiri Jaromir Klemes; Wei Xie; Chengdong Wang; Wenqing Li; Yutao Wang;

  • 作者单位

    Fudan Tyndall Center Department of Environmental Science & Engineering Fudan University Shanghai 200438 China;

    Fudan Tyndall Center Department of Environmental Science & Engineering Fudan University Shanghai 200438 China;

    Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 China;

    Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL NETME Centre Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Brno University of Technology - VUT Brno Technicka 2896/2 616 69 Brno Czech Republic;

    Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL NETME Centre Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Brno University of Technology - VUT Brno Technicka 2896/2 616 69 Brno Czech Republic;

    Fudan Tyndall Center Department of Environmental Science & Engineering Fudan University Shanghai 200438 China;

    Fudan Tyndall Center Department of Environmental Science & Engineering Fudan University Shanghai 200438 China;

    Fudan Tyndall Center Department of Environmental Science & Engineering Fudan University Shanghai 200438 China;

    Fudan Tyndall Center Department of Environmental Science & Engineering Fudan University Shanghai 200438 China Institute of Eco-Chongming (IEC) No.3663 Northern Zhongshan Road Shanghai 20006 China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Three-dimensional Ecological Footprint; Human Development Index; Ecological well-being performance; Natural capital; Human welfare; Sustainability evaluation;

    机译：三维生态足迹;人类发展指数;生态福祉表现;自然资本;人类福利;可持续性评估;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号