首页> 外文期刊>Journal of environmental psychology >How good are these directions? Determining direction quality and wayfinding efficiency
【24h】

How good are these directions? Determining direction quality and wayfinding efficiency

机译:这些方向有多好?确定方向质量和寻路效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Our goal was to specify the effectiveness of wayfinding directions in a complex indoor environment. We measured direction quality using effectiveness ratings and behavioral indices. In Study 1, participants provided effectiveness ratings for seven combinations of wayfinding descriptions. In general, ratings were higher for route details than for survey details, and ratings increased as the number of features increased. Moreover, people with a good self-reported sense of direction gave higher ratings to survey descriptions (cardinal directions and distances) relative to those with a poor self-reported sense of direction. In Study 2, participants provided effectiveness ratings for route and survey directions before and after wayfinding using these directions. Route directions resulted in fewer wayfinding errors and higher effectiveness ratings than did survey directions. People with a poor self-reported sense of direction made more wayfinding errors and provided lower effectiveness ratings than did people with a good self-reported sense of direction. We also demonstrated important relations between wayfinding errors and ratings after wayfinding, as well as links with sense of direction, wayfinding strategies, and mental rotation.
机译:我们的目标是在复杂的室内环境中指定寻路方向的有效性。我们使用有效性等级和行为指标来衡量方向质量。在研究1中,参与者提供了7种寻路说明组合的有效性等级。通常,路线详细信息的等级高于调查详细信息,并且等级随着要素数量的增加而提高。此外,相对于自我报告的方向感较差的人,自我报告的方向感良好的人对调查描述(基本方向和距离)的评价较高。在研究2中,参与者在使用这些指示进行寻路之前和之后提供了针对路线和调查指示的有效性等级。与调查指示相比,路线指示减少了寻路错误,并提高了效率等级。与自我报告方向感良好的人相比,自我报告方向感较差的人犯了更多的寻路错误,并且提供的有效性评分较低。我们还演示了寻路错误与寻路后评级之间的重要关系,以及与方向感,寻路策略和思维旋转的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号