首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance >Court of Appeal dismisses appeal on admissibility of FSA material as evidence in Directors Disqualification Proceedings
【24h】

Court of Appeal dismisses appeal on admissibility of FSA material as evidence in Directors Disqualification Proceedings

机译:上诉法院驳回了有关FSA材料可接纳性的上诉,作为董事取消资格程序中的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – The paper's aim is to outline and comment on the Court of Appeal case: Secretary of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v. Aaron and Others, October 2008. Design/methodology/approach – The paper outlines the facts surrounding the case and comments on the ruling. Findings – Lord Justice Thomas gave the judgment in this appeal, considering the admissible in disqualification proceedings. However, in relation to the Secretary of State's attempt to rely in evidence on material in the FOS decision and the FSA final notice LJ Thomas ruled that that the implied exception to the strict rule of evidence in Hollington v. Hewthorn did not apply so as to allow their admission in evidence. Originality/value – The current market crisis has focused the attention of regulatory investigators around the world on the activities of major UK financial institutions in a number of jurisdictions in which they were active.
机译:目的–本文的目的是概述上诉法院的案子并发表评论:商业和法规改革国务卿诉亚伦等人案,2008年10月。设计/方法论/方法–本文概述了围绕该案的事实。对裁决的评论。调查结果–托马斯大法官在上诉中做出了判决,考虑了取消资格程序中的受理条件。然而,关于国务卿试图以FOS决定和FSA最终通知中的材料为依据的证据,LJ Thomas裁定,对Hollington诉Hewthorn的严格证据规则的默示例外并不适用于允许他们作为证据。原创性/价值–当前的市场危机已将全球监管调查人员的注意力集中在活跃的许多司法管辖区中的英国主要金融机构的活动上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号