...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health economics >Implicit versus explicit ranking: On inferring ordinal preferences for health care programmes based on differences in willingness-to-pay
【24h】

Implicit versus explicit ranking: On inferring ordinal preferences for health care programmes based on differences in willingness-to-pay

机译：内隐与显式排名：基于支付意愿的差异推断医疗保健计划的序贯偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The paper explores the merit of the willingness-to-pay (WTP) method as a way to elicit public preferences regarding health care priorities. The aim is to test the extent to which the implicit ranking inferred from the ordinal differences in WTP-values corresponds with respondents' explicit ranking of the same programmes. This issue of convergent validity is explored by face-to-face interviewing of population samples in six European countries—in total 1240 respondents. The most consistent result is the inconsistency of WTP and explicit ranking in all six countries. The convergent validity of WTP is low, particularly among those who did not state different WTP-values on the three programmes being considered.
机译：本文探讨了支付意愿（WTP）方法的优点，这种方法可以引起公众对医疗保健优先事项的偏好。目的是测试从WTP值的有序差异推断出的隐式排名与受访者对同一节目的显式排名相对应的程度。通过对六个欧洲国家（总共1240个受访者）的人口样本进行面对面访谈，探讨了聚合效度的问题。最一致的结果是在所有六个国家中WTP和显式排名的不一致。 WTP的收敛有效性很低，尤其是在那些没有考虑所考虑的三个程序的WTP值不同的人群中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号