...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Health Services Research & Policy >What leads to better health care innovation? Arguments for an integrated policy-oriented research agenda
【24h】

What leads to better health care innovation? Arguments for an integrated policy-oriented research agenda

机译：是什么导致更好的医疗保健创新？关于以政策为导向的综合研究议程的论点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This essay is based on the recognition that the current ‘downstream’ health services research and policy approach to innovation misses the mark on one crucial point. It has not addressed how to promote the design of innovations that are likely to be more valuable than others. Re-visiting the ways in which health services research could inform innovation processes, this paper suggests that three attributes make innovations especially compelling from a health care system perspective: relevance; usability; and sustainability. These could be used as a starting point for outlining a policy-oriented research agenda that could bridge upstream design processes, and downstream needs and priorities. Given the pace at which innovations come about and the complexity of health care systems, we believe that both research and policy should be able to contribute significantly to the shaping of socially valuable technological change in health care. Recognizing that such a long-term goal cannot be reached through a linear, rationalistic process, our paper offers preliminary arguments to start to reconcile the health policy and innovation agendas.
机译：本文是基于这样的认识，即当前的“下游”医疗服务研究和创新政策方法在一个关键点上没有留下印记。它还没有解决如何促进可能比其他方法更有价值的创新设计。重新审视卫生服务研究可以为创新过程提供信息的方式，本文提出，从卫生保健系统的角度来看，三个属性使创新尤其引人注目：相关性；可用性；和可持续性。这些可以用作概述以政策为导向的研究议程的起点，该议程可以桥接上游设计流程，下游需求和优先事项。鉴于创新的步伐和医疗保健系统的复杂性，我们认为研究和政策都应能够为塑造医疗保健中具有社会价值的技术变革做出重大贡献。认识到不能通过线性，理性的过程来达到这样的长期目标，我们的论文提供了开始调和卫生政策与创新议程的初步论据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号