...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences >Necessary Torture? Vivisection, Suffragette Force-Feeding, and Responses to Scientific Medicine in Britain c. 1870–1920
【24h】

Necessary Torture? Vivisection, Suffragette Force-Feeding, and Responses to Scientific Medicine in Britain c. 1870–1920

机译:必要的酷刑吗?活体解剖,参议员强迫送养以及英国对科学医学的反应c。 1870–1920

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the primary aims of late nineteenth-century laboratory experimentation was to ground understandings of illness and disease within new regimes of science. It was also hoped that clinical practice would become increasingly complemented by discoveries and technologies accrued from emergent forms of modern medical enquiry, and that, ultimately, this would lead to improved diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that could be applied to a wide variety of medical complaints. This met with resistance in Britain. So far, analyses of the British reception to forms of scientific medicine have focused on a science versus intuition dichotomy. This article aims to address other aspects intertwined in the debate through an exploration of alternative representations of the medical scientist available and the relation of this to perceptions of clinical practice. Using new technologies of the stomach as a case study, I shall examine how physiologists approached digestion in the laboratory, the responses of antivivisectionists to this, the application of gastric innovations at the clinical level, and the impact of the use of the stomach tube in the suffragette force-feeding controversy.
机译:十九世纪末期实验室实验的主要目的之一是在新的科学体系内建立对疾病和疾病的理解。人们还希望临床实践将越来越多地被现代医学询问的新兴形式所产生的发现和技术所补充,并且最终,这将导致改进的诊断和治疗程序得以应用于各种医疗投诉中。这在英国遭到了抵抗。到目前为止,对英国对科学医学形式的接受的分析主要集中在科学与直觉二分法之间。本文旨在通过探讨可利用的医学科学家的替代代表及其与临床实践观念之间的关系,解决辩论中交织在一起的其他方面。我将以胃的新技术为例,研究生理学家如何在实验室中进行消化,抗活体检查专家对此的反应,胃创新在临床水平上的应用以及胃管在胃中使用的影响。关于参议员的强制性供养的争论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号