首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Rights Practice >Producing the Evidence that Human Rights Advocacy Works: First Steps towards Systematized Evaluation at Human Rights Watch
【24h】

Producing the Evidence that Human Rights Advocacy Works: First Steps towards Systematized Evaluation at Human Rights Watch

机译:提供人权倡导有效的证据:人权观察系统化评估的第一步

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the community of human rights activists and professionals, we share a conviction that we make a difference. But attributing positive change to our own work is often uncertain. At the same time, as our presence in the media and in discussions with policy-makers grows, and is seen to grow, we face a hostile audience as never before. There are many—our direct targets and others—who would like to discredit and dismiss human rights organizations, or are skeptical of the value of condemning human rights abuse in the absence of an appetite among influential governments to apply meaningful leverage. Both the hostility and the skepticism raise the stakes for us to explain our purpose and our tactics, including in terms of how we assess that we are effective.
机译:在人权活动家和专业人员社区,我们坚信我们会有所作为。但是,将积极的变化归因于我们自己的工作通常是不确定的。同时,随着我们在媒体中的参与以及与决策者的讨论不断增长,而且人们看到这种增长,我们将面对前所未有的敌对听众。有许多人(我们的直接目标是其他人)想破坏和解散人权组织,或者对有影响力的政府缺乏施加有意义的杠杆作用的欲望,谴责谴责侵犯人权行为的价值。敌对与怀疑都使我们有理由去解释我们的目的和策略,包括在我们如何评估自己是否有效方面。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Human Rights Practice》 |2009年第3期|p.477-487|共11页
  • 作者

    Ian Gorvin⇓;

  • 作者单位

    Human Rights WatchProgram Office2-12 Pentonville RoadLondon N1 9HFUK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号