首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Rights >Status-Differentiated Rights
【24h】

Status-Differentiated Rights

机译:地位不同的权利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article defines status-differentiated rights and identifies examples from international principles, declarations, and conventions. Drawing on the work of Peter Jones and Will Kymlicka, status-differentiated rights are compared and contrasted to group and group-differentiated rights. Using Jack Donnelly's three-tiered scheme of substance-interpretation-implementation, the article also demonstrates how status-differentiated rights complicate the equal-special rights binary; this is because some rights are status undifferentiated at one level, yet status differentiated at another. This article concludes that addressing the diverse harms faced by (members of) vulnerable status groups requires both “ordinary” human rights and status-differentiated rights.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2012.702030
机译:本文定义了区分身份的权利,并举例说明了国际原则,声明和公约中的例子。借鉴彼得·琼斯(Peter Jones)和威尔·金姆利卡(Will Kymlicka)的工作,将地位不同的权利与群体和群体不同的权利进行比较和对比。本文还使用杰克·唐纳利(Jack Donnelly)的物质解释-实现的三层方案,说明了区分状态的权利如何使等特殊权利二进制复杂化。这是因为某些权利的状态在一个级别上没有区别,而状态在另一个级别上却有所区别。本文的结论是,要解决弱势地位群体(的成员)所面临的各种危害,既需要“普通”人权,又需要区分身份的权利。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线” ,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2012.702030

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号