• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Rights >Vanishing Points: When Narrative Is Not Simply There
【24h】

Vanishing Points: When Narrative Is Not Simply There

机译：消失点：当叙事不只是存在时

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The narrative turn in the social sciences and the ethical turn in the humanities that occurred in the 1990s converged in the study of human rights and social justice. Human rights, it was argued, were about and dependent upon modes of storytelling; torture was often cited as a paradigmatic example of the ways in which narrative and human rights were co-implicated. The centralization of torture in the prosecution of the “War on Terror” and the recent declassification of documents authorizing the use of torture by US personnel offers an important occasion to reconsider some of the tenets of the arguments about human rights and narrative. This essay considers the problem of declassification as a process of un-narration and examines some of the ways that art and literature have attempted to deal with the stories of torture that are actively untold.
机译：1990年代发生的社会科学叙事转向和人文科学伦理转向转向了对人权和社会正义的研究。有人认为，人权与讲故事的模式有关，并取决于这种模式。经常将酷刑作为叙事与人权共同牵连方式的典范。在“反恐战争”的起诉中，酷刑的集中化以及最近授权美国人员使用酷刑的文件的解密，为重新考虑有关人权和叙事论点的原则提供了重要的机会。本文将解密问题视为一种不叙事的过程，并考察了艺术和文学试图处理积极流传下来的酷刑故事的一些方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号