• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Rights >Rendering Global Criminal Law an Instrument of Power: Pragmatic Legalism and Global Tribunals
【24h】

Rendering Global Criminal Law an Instrument of Power: Pragmatic Legalism and Global Tribunals

机译：使全球刑法成为一种权力工具：务实的法律主义和全球法庭

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although supporters of global tribunals are often depicted as “judicial romantics,” they generally agree that the legal process should adapt to national interests and power politics. Hence, they defend a historical pattern of selective justice whereby influential states have shaped the legal process for political ends and the trials have targeted individuals from regimes defeated in war or otherwise out of favor with influential states. I label this perspective pragmatic legalism. It holds that adapting the legal process to the political concerns of great powers and influential local actors is necessary for enabling a desirable legal order to take shape.This article argues that rather than rescue legalism from idealistic irrelevancy, the pragmatic-legalist approach endorses a global legal order crippled by political distortions. To develop this critique, I challenge the pragmatic-legalist defense of the post-WWII tribunals—which established the enterprise—and the ongoing International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda—that has further legalized the process and relocated it to the global periphery. I show a consistent tendency to romanticize the benefits of legalization and to minimize the harms of political manipulations. I maintain that the tribunals have legitimated and institutionalized a corrupted version of global criminal law. I conclude that a critical reevaluation is in order of global tribunals and of the pragmatic-legalist perspective.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2010.522923
机译：尽管全球法庭的支持者通常被描述为“司法浪漫主义者”，但他们普遍同意法律程序应适应国家利益和强权政治。因此，他们捍卫了选择性正义的历史模式，在这个模式中，有影响力的国家塑造了政治目的的法律程序，审判针对的是那些在战争中战败或不受欢迎的国家。我称这种观点为务实的法制主义。它认为，使法律程序适应大国和有影响力的地方参与者的政治关注对于使理想的法律秩序得以形成是必要的。本文认为，务实的法律主义者的方法不是从理想主义的无关性中拯救法制主义，而是认可一种全球化的方法。政治秩序因政治扭曲而瘫痪。为了发展这种批评，我挑战了第二次世界大战后法庭的实用主义法律主义辩护，后者建立了企业，而正在进行的卢旺达国际刑事法庭也进一步使这一程序合法化，并将其转移到全球边缘。我表现出一贯的趋势，即浪漫化合法化的好处，并尽量减少政治操纵的危害。我坚持认为，法庭已将全球刑法的腐败版本合法化并制度化。我认为，对全球法庭和务实的法律主义者的顺序进行重新评估是至关重要的。查看全文下载全文，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2010.522923

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号