• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Rights >Between Commitment and Pragmatism: Assessing International Influence on Human Rights Practices in Georgia
【24h】

Between Commitment and Pragmatism: Assessing International Influence on Human Rights Practices in Georgia

机译：在承诺和实用主义之间：评估国际对格鲁吉亚人权实践的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

What explains the discrepancy between the avowed commitment of the Georgian government to human rights and praxis of human rights in the post-Rose Revolution republic? This article engages with this question and attributes persistent breaches of civil, political, and personal integrity rights in Georgia not only to its domestic circumstances but also to the international impact. The study develops a reference group theory; a type of social theory that stresses the influence of social groups of states on policies and behavior of their members. Reference groups endorse goals, values, and standards of behavior for their members and serve as the “frames of reference” that enable other states to assess the effectiveness and legitimacy of their actions. The findings of this study indicate that Georgia's reference groups, particularly the United States, contributed to its backsliding on human rights by (1) supporting the Georgian government in its goal of rebuilding the state prior to democratizing it and strengthening respect for human rights; (2) redirecting financial and other assistance from democracy promotion to state-building projects; and (3) providing the Georgian government with flattering, yet, misleading feedback concerning the republic's accomplishments in the area of human rights.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2010.522925
机译：在罗斯福革命后的共和国中，格鲁吉亚政府对人权的坚定承诺与人权实践之间的差异解释了什么？本文涉及这个问题，并将格鲁吉亚持续侵犯公民，政治和人身安全权的原因不仅归因于其国内情况，还归因于国际影响。该研究发展了参考群体理论。一种强调社会国家集团对其成员的政策和行为的影响的社会理论。参考小组认可其成员的目标，价值观和行为标准，并充当“参考框架”，使其他国家能够评估其行动的有效性和合法性。这项研究的结果表明，格鲁吉亚的参考团体，特别是美国，通过以下方式促进了其在人权方面的后退：（1）支持格鲁吉亚政府在国家民主化之前重建国家和加强对人权的尊重的目标； （2）将财政和其他援助从促进民主转向国家建设项目； （3）向格鲁吉亚政府提供有关共和国在人权领域成就的奉承，但产生了令人误解的反馈。查看全文下载全文，twitter，technorati，可口，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2010.522925

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号