...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of information systems >Accounting Institution Citation-Based Research Rankings by Topical Area and Methodology
【24h】

Accounting Institution Citation-Based Research Rankings by Topical Area and Methodology

机译:基于主题领域和方法论的基于会计机构引文的研究排名

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study creates citation-based rankings for accounting institutions by topical areas (AIS, audit, financial, managerial, tax, and other) and methodologies (archival, analytical, experimental, and other) extending prior count-based ranking studies that disaggregate rankings by topic and methodology. We report separate rankings for different year windows (previous six years, 12 years, and since 1990) and only give institutions credit for authors who currently work for the institution. We show that disaggregated citation-based rankings are important as the correlations for some topic areas and methodologies with an overall ranking are modest. We also show that the correlation for citation-based and count-based rankings can differ significantly in some situations suggesting the importance of considering both types of rankings in decision making.
机译:这项研究按主题领域(AIS,审计,财务,管理,税务和其他)和方法(档案,分析,实验和其他)为会计机构创建了基于引文的排名,扩展了以前基于计数的排名研究,该排名研究按主题和方法。我们针对不同的年份窗口(前六年,十二年和1990年以来)报告不同的排名,并且仅授予机构当前在该机构工作的作者的信用。我们显示,基于分类引文的排名很重要,因为某些主题领域和方法论与总体排名的相关性不高。我们还显示,在某些情况下,基于引用的排名和基于计数的排名的相关性可能存在显着差异,这表明在决策过程中考虑两种类型的排名的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号