【24h】

Commentary

机译:评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Chaudhuri has written a provocative and timely paper. His main thesis is that there are very few rigorous evaluations of individual ICT projects in developing countries and that one should be correspondingly sceptical of promoting these technologies in such countries (It is inconsistent though also to assert that Internet projects mostly fail for without some sort of evaluative framework how can failure be established?). What I will argue below is that the author somewhat overstates his case and more tellingly looks in the wrong place for support of the contention that this technology promotes growth.
机译:乔杜里(Chaudhuri)撰写了一篇具有启发性的及时论文。他的主要论点是,对发展中国家的单个ICT项目很少进行严格的评估,因此应该相应地对在这些国家推广这些技术持怀疑态度(尽管这也断言互联网项目在没有某种形式的支持下大多会失败)评价框架如何建立失败?)。我在下面将要论证的是,作者在某种程度上夸大了他的案子,更能说明问题的是,在错误的地方寻找了支持该技术促进增长的论点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号