• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of informetrics >Do Article Influence scores overestimate the citation impact of social science journals in subfields that are related to higher-impact natural science disciplines?
【24h】

Do Article Influence scores overestimate the citation impact of social science journals in subfields that are related to higher-impact natural science disciplines?

机译：“文章影响力”分数是否高估了与影响力更大的自然科学学科相关的子领域中社会科学期刊的引文影响？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Unlike Impact Factors (IF), Article Influence (AI) scores assign greater weight to citations that appear in highly cited journals. The natural sciences tend to have higher citation rates than the social sciences. We might therefore expect that relative to IF, AI overestimates the citation impact of social science journals in subfields that are related to (and presumably cited in) higher-impact natural science disciplines. This study evaluates that assertion through a set of simple and multiple regressions covering seven social science disciplines: anthropology, communication, economics, education, library and information science, psychology, and sociology. Contrary to expectations, AI underestimates 5IF (five-year Impact Factor) for journals in science-related subfields such as scientific communication, science education, scientometrics, biopsychology, and medical sociology. Journals in these subfields have low AI scores relative to their 5IF values. Moreover, the effect of science-related status is considerable-typically 0.60 5IF units or 0.50 SD. This effect is independent of the more general finding that AI scores underestimate 5IF for higher-impact journals. It is also independent of the very modest curvilinearity in the relationship between AI and 5IF.
机译：与影响因子（IF）不同，文章影响（AI）得分对出现在高引用期刊中的引用给予更大的重视。自然科学比社会科学的引文率更高。因此，我们可能希望相对于IF，AI会高估与影响力更大的自然科学学科相关的子领域中社会科学期刊的引文影响。这项研究通过一组涵盖七个社会科学学科的简单和多元回归评估了这一主张：人类学，传播学，经济学，教育学，图书馆和信息科学，心理学和社会学。与期望相反，人工智能低估了与科学相关的子领域（如科学传播，科学教育，科学计量，生物心理学和医学社会学）的期刊的5IF（五年影响因子）。相对于其5IF值，这些子字段中的日记的AI得分较低。此外，与科学相关的状态的影响相当大-通常为0.60 5IF单位或0.50 SD。这种影响独立于更普遍的发现，即对于影响力较大的期刊，AI分数低估了5IF。它也独立于AI与5IF之间关系的适度曲线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号