...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Infrastructure Systems >Risk Allocation in Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: Comparative Study
【24h】

Risk Allocation in Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: Comparative Study

机译：公私合营基础设施项目中的风险分配：比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is important for the public and private sectors to establish effective risk allocation strategies for public-private partnership (PPP) projects in order to achieve a more efficient process of contract negotiation and reduce the occurrence of dispute during the concession period. This paper aims first to identify the preferred risk allocation in PPP projects of mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (referred to as China and Hong Kong from here onward) and then to compare these preferences to those in the U.K. and Greece by a questionnaire survey based on the same risk register. The results in China and Hong Kong show that the public sector preferred to retain most political, legal, and social risks, and share most microlevel risks and force majeure risk; while the majority of mesolevel risks were preferred to be allocated to the private sector. The comparative analyses of risk allocation preference among these four countries/jurisdictions indicate that the public sector in the U.K. was most able to transfer the PPP risks to the private sector, followed by Greece, Hong Kong, and China. Respondents from Greece exhibited the greatest degree of support for the public sector to retain the macrolevel risks. All respondents agreed that private investors should take a more active role in managing the mesolevel risks. Respondents from China and Hong Kong considered that majority of the microlevel risks should be shared equally between the public and private sectors, while respondents from Greece indicated that the private sector should take a more active role in managing the microlevel risks. The comparative study provides international investors a better understanding of risk preferences in different countries/jurisdictions so that they could adjust their strategies according to the specific situation and achieve better value for money in running their PPP projects.
机译：对于公私部门而言，为公私伙伴关系（PPP）项目制定有效的风险分配策略非常重要，以实现更有效的合同谈判流程并减少特许期内的纠纷发生。本文的目的是首先确定中国大陆和香港特别行政区（此后称为中国和香港）的PPP项目中的首选风险分配，然后通过比较将这些偏好与英国和希腊的偏好进行比较。基于相同风险登记表的问卷调查。中国和香港的结果表明，公共部门倾向于保留大多数政治，法律和社会风险，并承担大多数微观风险和不可抗力风险。而大多数中等水平的风险则倾向于分配给私营部门。这四个国家/地区之间对风险分配偏好的比较分析表明，英国的公共部门最有能力将PPP风险转移给私营部门，其次是希腊，香港和中国。希腊的受访者对公共部门保留最大程度的风险表示了最大程度的支持。所有受访者都同意，私人投资者应在管理中级风险方面发挥更加积极的作用。来自中国大陆和香港的受访者认为，大多数微观风险应在公共部门和私营部门之间平均分配，而希腊的受访者表示，私营部门应在管理微观风险方面发挥更加积极的作用。这项比较研究为国际投资者提供了对不同国家/地区的风险偏好的更好理解，从而使他们可以根据具体情况调整策略，并在运行其PPP项目时获得更高的性价比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号