• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of institutional economics >Determinants of in-court settlements: empirical evidence from a German trial court
【24h】

Determinants of in-court settlements: empirical evidence from a German trial court

机译：庭内和解的决定因素：德国审判法院的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Because verdicts are typically the more costly resolution of legal disputes, most governments are interested in high settlement rates. In this paper, we use a unique dataset of 860 case records from a German trial court to explore which institutional factors have a significant impact on the decision to settle in civil law litigation. We find that procedural aspects and individual characteristics of the involved judge have a significant impact on in-court settlement probability. We also find that judge-specific aspects such as the judge's gender may have an impact on settlement probabilities in certain subfields of law. Based on our empirical results, we derive some conclusions for legal policies that aim at increasing settlement rates.
机译：由于判决通常是解决法律纠纷的代价更高的解决方案，因此大多数政府都对高解决率感兴趣。在本文中，我们使用来自德国审判法院的860个案例记录的唯一数据集，来探讨哪些制度因素对和解民事诉讼的决定有重大影响。我们发现，所涉法官的程序方面和个人特征对庭内和解概率具有重大影响。我们还发现，特定于法官的方面，例如法官的性别，可能会对某些法律子领域中的和解概率产生影响。根据我们的经验结果，我们得出了旨在提高和解率的法律政策的一些结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号