• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of institutional economics >Linking precolonial institutions with ethnic fractionalisation: what are we measuring?
【24h】

Linking precolonial institutions with ethnic fractionalisation: what are we measuring?

机译：将前殖民主义制度与种族分化联系起来：我们在衡量什么？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper highlights a link between measures for precolonial institutions and ethnic fractionalisation in postcolonial countries. A conceptual explanation is provided for why countries that were more politically centralised in precolonial times should be less ethnically fractionalised in current times. This result is confirmed for a sample of postcolonial countries in Africa, Asia and the Pacific. This is followed by a comparative case study in the South Pacific countries of Papua New Guinea, Tonga and Samoa. It is hoped that these results will lead to further empirical work focused at delving deeper into the link between these two measures to better understand what they are actually measuring, and why both are so closely related to economic development.
机译：本文着重说明了前殖民制度的措施与后殖民国家的种族分化之间的联系。提供了概念上的解释，说明了为什么在前殖民时期政治上更加集中的国家在当今时代应减少种族分化。非洲，亚洲和太平洋地区的一些后殖民国家的这一结果得到了证实。接下来是在巴布亚新几内亚，汤加和萨摩亚等南太平洋国家进行的比较案例研究。希望这些结果将导致进行进一步的实证研究，着重于深入研究这两种措施之间的联系，以更好地了解它们实际测量的内容以及为什么两者都与经济发展如此密切地联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号