...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of institutional economics >Institutions and place: bringing context back into the study of the resource curse
【24h】

Institutions and place: bringing context back into the study of the resource curse

机译：制度和场所：将背景带回资源诅咒研究中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Scholars across the social sciences have debated whether resource dependence curses or blesses national development prospects, with a growing consensus on mixed outcomes and the centrality of institutions. Mainstream literature, however, falls short in depicting what the resource curse entails: the claim that institutions matter usually has a narrow meaning that largely overlooks the significance of place. A review of the paved road in research reveals a need to critically integrate approaches to studying the curse, as well as more insightful research on which institutions matter, how, and where. Expounding six governance challenges and thirteen development traps, I set out a simple yet crucial lesson: resource-based development presents both blessings and curses for any given resource-rich country in any given time period, and institutions are likely to be part of the explanation. I sketch how a context matters framework could guide future research, with illustrations from the Latin American experience.
机译：社会科学界的学者一直在争论资源依赖是诅咒还是祝福国家发展前景，人们对混合结果和制度中心地位的共识日渐增多。然而，主流文献在描述资源诅咒的含义方面是不够的：制度重要的主张通常具有狭窄的含义，在很大程度上忽略了地点的重要性。对研究铺平道路的评论表明，有必要将研究诅咒的方法进行批判性整合，以及对哪些机构重要，如何以及在何处进行更深入的研究。在阐述六个治理挑战和十三个发展陷阱时，我提出了一个简单但至关重要的课程：基于资源的发展既代表了给定资源丰富国家在任何特定时期内的福气，也代表了诅咒，而制度很可能是解释的一部分。我以拉丁美洲经验为例，勾勒出一个背景重要的框架如何指导未来的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号