Can capitalism restrain public perceived corruption? Some evidence

HUGO J. FARIA; DANIEL R. MORALES; NATASHA PINEDA; HUGO M. MONTESINOS

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of institutional economics >Can capitalism restrain public perceived corruption? Some evidence

【24h】

Can capitalism restrain public perceived corruption? Some evidence

机译：资本主义可以抑制公众认为的腐败吗？一些证据

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

A growing body of evidence documents a vast array of economic and social ill-effects of public perceived corruption. These findings and the scant evidence of recent success in the fight against corruption beg the question: how to abate it? We document the existence of a negative, statistically significant and quantitatively large impact of economic freedom (our proxy for institutions of capitalism, markets and competition) on public corruption. This negative response of corruption to economic freedom holds after allowing for non-linearities interacting economic freedom and political rights, endowments, legal families, ethnicity and for robust determinants of corruption uncovered by Daniel Treisman ['What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption From Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research?', Annual Review of Political Science, 10: 211-244], such as income, democracy, freedom of the press and fuel exports. Thus, this paper helps to explain why high-income prosperous countries exhibit low levels of public perceived corruption, and why honesty is a normal good.

机译：越来越多的证据表明，公众感知到的腐败对经济和社会造成了各种各样的影响。这些发现和最近在反腐败斗争中取得成功的证据很少，便提出了一个问题：如何减少腐败？我们记录了经济自由（我们对资本主义，市场和竞争制度的代理）对公共腐败的负面影响，统计意义重大且数量巨大。腐败对经济自由的这种消极反应是在允许非线性因素相互作用的经济自由与政治权利、,赋，法制家庭，种族以及丹尼尔·特里斯曼（Daniel Treisman）发现的强有力的腐败决定因素之后一直存在的[我们从中了解到的腐败原因十年的跨国实证研究？，政治学年度评论，第10期：211-244]，例如收入，民主，新闻自由和燃料出口。因此，本文有助于解释为什么高收入富裕国家的公众对腐败的认识程度较低，以及诚实是一种正常现象。

著录项

来源
《Journal of institutional economics》 |2012年第4期|p.511-535|共25页
作者
HUGO J. FARIA; DANIEL R. MORALES; NATASHA PINEDA; HUGO M. MONTESINOS;
展开▼
作者单位

Instituto de Estudios Superiores de Administracion (IESA) Caracas, Venezuela;

Barna Business School, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic;

Instituto de Estudios Superiores de Administracion (IESA) Caracas, Venezuela;

Universidad Simon Bolivar (USB) and Instituto de Estudios Superiores de Administracion (IESA) Caracas, Venezuela;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Corruption Experience and Public Perceptions of Anti-corruption Crackdowns: Experimental Evidence from China [J] . Hui Li, Tianguang Meng Journal of Chinese political science . 2020,第3期

机译：腐败经验和对反腐败打击的公众看法：来自中国的实验证据
2. How do US investors perceive the risk of local political corruption? Evidence from acquisition announcement [J] . Jiang Xuejun, Lu Louise Accounting and finance . 2021,第1期

机译：美国投资者如何察觉当地政治腐败的风险？收购公告的证据
3. Electoral cycles in perceived corruption: International empirical evidence [J] . Potrafke Niklas Journal of comparative economics . 2019,第1期

机译：感知腐败中的选举周期：国际经验证据
4. Association of National Dimensions of Culture with Perceived Public Sector Corruption [C] . Denis A. Coelho International conference on human-computer interaction . 2015

机译：国家文化层面与可察觉的公共部门腐败的关联
5. The relationship between the adoption of International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) by governments and perceived levels of corruption. [D] . Atuilik, Williams Abayaawien. 2013

机译：政府采用国际公共部门会计准则（IPSAS）与腐败程度之间的关系。
6. Impact of organizational climate on organizational commitment and perceived organizational performance: empirical evidence from public hospitals [O] . Aysen Berberoglu 2018

机译：组织氛围对组织承诺和感知组织绩效的影响：公立医院的经验证据
7. Upside of Evidence by Public Prosecutor in The Case Corruption by Act No. 31 of 1999 jo. Act No. 20 of 2001 on Combating Crime of Corruption [O] . Suwono Suwono, Jawade Hafidz 2018

机译：1999年1999年第31号法案的案件腐败中检察官的上行证据。 2001年第20号法案打击腐败犯罪

Can capitalism restrain public perceived corruption? Some evidence

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅