...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of institutional economics >Constraining the state's ability to employ force: the standing army debates, 1697-99
【24h】

Constraining the state's ability to employ force: the standing army debates, 1697-99

机译：限制国家使用武力的能力：常备军辩论，697-99年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Britain's Glorious Revolution of 1688 is one of the most widely studied cases of institutional change. Recent institutional analyses of the Glorious Revolution, however, have failed to address one of the central issues in political science: control of the state's comparative advantage in violence. This paper examines this issue through analysis of the standing army debates of the late 1690s. Participants in the debates disputed whether a standing army or a militia would be the most effective institutional arrangement to guard against threats from abroad and tyranny at home. Both sides of the debate analyzed the effects of a standing army in terms of the incentives that it created for soldiers, citizens, the monarch, and foreign governments.
机译：英国1688年的光荣革命是机构变更最广泛的案例之一。然而，最近对光荣革命的制度分析未能解决政治学的核心问题之一：控制国家在暴力方面的相对优势。本文通过分析1690年代后期常备军的辩论来研究这个问题。辩论的参加者对常备军或民兵是否是防范国外威胁和国内暴政的最有效体制安排存有争议。辩论的双方从常备军对士兵，公民，君主和外国政府产生的激励方面分析了常备军的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号