...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of interactive learning research >An Exploratory Study of Interactivity in Visualization Tools: 'Flow' of Interaction
【24h】

An Exploratory Study of Interactivity in Visualization Tools: 'Flow' of Interaction

机译:可视化工具中交互性的探索性研究:交互的“流程”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper deals with the design of interactivity in visualization tools. There are several factors that can be used to guide the analysis and design of the interactivity of these tools. One such factor is flow, which is concerned with the duration of interaction with visual representations of information-interaction being the actions performed by users on these representations and the reactions given back by the representations. Four forms of flow can be identified: 1) continuous action, continuous reaction; 2) continuous action, discrete reaction; 3) discrete action, continuous reaction; and 4) discrete action, discrete reaction. Structuring micro-level interactions of tools based on these forms of flow can have varying effects on the cognitive processes of users. Based on this classification of flow, four versions of an interactive visualization tool were created and studied. The testbed for this study was 3D geometric solids-more specifically, Platonic and Archimedean solids. A multi-method empirical study was conducted to evaluate the usability of these four interfaces and their effect on learning, visual thinking, and exploration. This paper reports some findings of this study.
机译:本文涉及可视化工具中的交互性设计。有几个因素可以用来指导这些工具的交互性的分析和设计。一个这样的因素是流量,它与与信息交互的可视表示的交互作用的持续时间有关,交互作用的持续时间是用户对这些表示进行的动作以及表示所返回的反应。可以识别出四种流动形式:1)连续作用,连续反应; 2)连续作用,反应离散; 3)动作离散,连续反应;和4)离散作用,离散反应。基于这些形式的流程来构建工具的微观层次的交互可能会对用户的认知过程产生不同的影响。基于这种流分类,创建并研究了四个版本的交互式可视化工具。这项研究的测试平台是3D几何实体,更具体地说是柏拉图和阿基米德实体。进行了一项多方法实证研究,以评估这四个界面的可用性及其对学习,视觉思维和探索的影响。本文报告了这项研究的一些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号