...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Criminal Justice >The Special Tribunal for Lebanon Swiftly Adopts Its Rules of Procedure and Evidence
【24h】

The Special Tribunal for Lebanon Swiftly Adopts Its Rules of Procedure and Evidence

机译:黎巴嫩问题特别法庭迅速通过其议事规则和证据规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Judges of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) recently adopted the Rules of Procedure and Evidence to guide the work of the court in bringing to justice those responsible for the attack of 14 February 2005 that resulted in the death of then-Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri (‘the Hariri Attack’) as well as related attacks. These provisions draw heavily on analogous instruments of the International Criminal Court and the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. However, they also contain a number of innovations, including the enhanced role of the Pre-Trial Judge, the establishment of an independent and empowered Defence Office and the possibility of trials in absentia. The review carried out in this article is not a comprehensive analysis of every provision of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. Instead, the purpose is to describe the key features of this instrument and, in doing so, to highlight points of interest, intersection and divergence in comparison with the analogous instruments of other International Criminal Tribunals. As such, the exegesis is intended to provide an overview of the procedural framework of the STL that will be of use to scholars and practitioners alike.
机译:黎巴嫩问题特别法庭法官最近通过了《程序和证据规则》,以指导法院的工作,将造成2005年2月14日袭击事件的责任者绳之以法,这些袭击事件导致当时的黎巴嫩总理去世。 Rafiq Hariri(“ Hariri攻击”)以及相关攻击。这些规定在很大程度上借鉴了国际刑事法院和前南斯拉夫和卢旺达的国际刑事法庭的类似文书。但是,它们还包含许多创新,包括提高预审法官的作用,建立独立且有能力的国防办公室以及缺席审判的可能性。本文所进行的审查并非对《程序和证据规则》的所有规定的全面分析。相反,其目的是描述该文书的主要特征,并在这样做时强调与其他国际刑事法庭的类似文书相比的关注点,交叉点和分歧点。照此,训sis法旨在概述STL的程序框架,该框架将对学者和从业人员同样有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号