• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Economic Law >Special Economic Zones in International Economic Law: Towards Unilateral Economic Law
【24h】

Special Economic Zones in International Economic Law: Towards Unilateral Economic Law

机译：国际经济法中的特殊经济区：走向单方面的经济法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The international economic regime has entered a new phase of reassertion of sovereignty by States. While States continue to show respect for the values of international (economic) law, the institutionalization of these values has devolved from the international (to the regional) to the domestic level of governance. A new form of 'unilateral economic law' is thus gaining importance in the development of international and domestic laws and institutions. However, it remains largely understudied. This article discusses the development and proliferation as well as the importance of special economic zones as a new form of unilateral economic law in the overall system of international economic law. This article identifies four types of economic unilateralism: classical unilateralism, embedded unilateralism, sustainability unilateralism, and national security unilateralism. The new special economic zone unilateralism represents a middle ground between the two extremes of unilateral liberalization and aggressive unilateralism. Accordingly, special economic zone unilateralism introduces a new layer in the overall system of international economic law. First, special economic zones embody a new compromise between the State and the market. The State-controlled promotion of trade and investment taking place through special economic zones represents a complex compromise between the liberalization and protection of economic sovereignty. Second, the spatiality of trade and investment promotion through special economic zones is different from that of international economic law. The liberalization of trade and investment does not take place for the whole country but for an isolated jurisdiction within the broader national jurisdiction, while the focus is on the supply side rather than the traditional input factors of production. Overall, the new special economic zone unilateralism provides insights into the future of international economic law as envisaged by States. Special economic zones have been employed by States both as an alternative and as a complement to trade and investment promotion through the instruments of international economic law.
机译：国际经济制度已进入各国重申主权的新阶段。虽然各国继续表现出尊重国际（经济）法的价值观，但这些价值观的制度化已经从国际（区域）到国内治理水平。因此，新形式的“单方面经济法”是在国际和国内法律和机构的发展中取得重视。但是，它仍然很大程度上被解释出来。本文讨论了特殊经济区作为新形式的国际经济法制度的新形式的发展和扩散。本文确定了四种类型的经济单侧主义：古典单边主义，嵌入单方面，可持续性单边主义和国家安全单边主义。新的特殊经济区单边主义代表了两个单侧自由化和侵略性单边主义的两个极端之间的中间地位。因此，特殊经济区单边主义在国际经济法制度中引入了一层新层。首先，经济区体现了国家与市场之间的新折衷。通过特殊经济区促进贸易和投资的国家受控促进代表了自由化和经济主权保护之间的复杂妥协。其次，通过特殊经济区的贸易和投资促进的空间与国际经济法不同。整个国家的贸易和投资的自由化不会发生，但对于更广泛的国家管辖区内的孤立司法管辖区，而重点是供应方而不是传统的生产投入因素。总体而言，新的经济区单边主义为各国设想的国际经济法的未来提供了见解。各国雇用了特殊经济区作为通过国际经济法文书作为贸易和投资促进的补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号