...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Economic Law >The EU–ACP Economic Partnership Agreements and the ‘Development Question’: Constraints and Opportunities Posed by Article XXIV and Special and Differential Treatment Provisions of the WTO
【24h】

The EU–ACP Economic Partnership Agreements and the ‘Development Question’: Constraints and Opportunities Posed by Article XXIV and Special and Differential Treatment Provisions of the WTO

机译：欧盟—非加太经济伙伴关系协定和“发展问题”：第二十四条以及世贸组织的特殊和差别待遇规定带来的制约和机遇

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article argues that Article XXIV and special and differential treatment (SDT) provisions of the WTO present a number of constraints and opportunities to the design and scope of the proposed economic partnership agreements between the European Union (EU) and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. It examines the negotiating positions of both sides to argue that were the EU's position to prevail, ACP and other developing countries would likely suffer an ‘erosion of the development principles’ embedded within the WTO. It is shown that the differences between the two groups over the desirability and/or applicability of negotiating free trade agreements between developed and developing countries under the ‘strict’ jurisdiction of Article XXIV, and of negotiating agreements on services and the ‘Singapore Issues’, amount to a contestation over the principles of reciprocity and SDT within the WTO, and of the scope of the WTO.
机译：本文认为，第二十四条和WTO的特殊和差别待遇（SDT）条款对拟议中的欧洲联盟（EU）与非洲，加勒比和太平洋地区之间的经济伙伴关系协定的设计和范围提出了许多限制和机遇（ ACP）国家。它审查了双方的谈判立场，以争辩说，如果欧盟占据主导地位，非加太和其他发展中国家可能会遭受世贸组织内嵌的“发展原则的侵蚀”。结果表明，在第二十四条“严格”管辖下，发达国家和发展中国家之间就自由贸易协定进行谈判，以及关于服务和“新加坡问题”的谈判协定的可取性和适用性方面，两组之间存在差异，构成对WTO中互惠和SDT原则以及WTO范围的争执。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号