...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of internet law >Justifying the ends:section 706 and the regulation of broadband
【24h】

Justifying the ends:section 706 and the regulation of broadband

机译:证明目的:第706条和宽带规定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In full, the agency's argument is that deployment is not reasonable or timely because it was not ubiquitous at the time it conducted its Section 706 inquiry. Yet, the agency's National Broadband Plan estimates that deploying broadband to the highest cost areas has a price tag of over $50,000 per housing unit (on average, with some households costing far more). No plausible cost-benefit analysis would justify such expenditure for terrestrial broadband service to the average household (only some of which use broadband). Given current technology, satellite broadband is the only economically sensible approach to providing service for thousands of U.S. households in the highest cost areas. If satellite is excluded
机译:总的来说,该机构的论点是部署是不合理或不及时的,因为在进行第706节调查时部署并不普遍。然而,该机构的《国家宽带计划》估计,将宽带部署到成本最高的地区,每套房屋的价格超过50,000美元(平均而言,有些家庭的价格要高得多)。没有任何合理的成本效益分析可以证明这种针对普通家庭的地面宽带服务支出(仅部分家庭使用宽带)是合理的。使用当前的技术,卫星宽带是在成本最高的地区为数千个美国家庭提供服务的唯一经济上明智的方法。如果排除卫星

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of internet law》 |2013年第7期|3-9|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies in Washington, D.C. (USA.);

    Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies in Washington, D.C. (U.S.A.);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号