• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of internet law >THE TRADE OF CROSS-BORDER INTERNET GAMBLING: THE DISPUTE CONTINUES
【24h】

THE TRADE OF CROSS-BORDER INTERNET GAMBLING: THE DISPUTE CONTINUES

机译：跨境互联网赌博交易：争议继续

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The current trade dispute between the United States and Antigua over the US ban on cross-border gambling services is in many ways a dispute about morals. On April 7, 2005, the WTO Appellate Body extensively reversed an earlier panel decision by recognizing for the first time that a trade restrictive measure was exempt from WTO obligations because it was "necessary to protect public morals." It held that, because the US ban on cross-border gambling is necessary to protect the US public from the vices of gambling, the United States is excused from its trade obligations of allowing market access for gambling services. The Appellate Body noted, however, that a federal law regarding betting on horseracing, the Interstate Horseracing Act (IHA), may negate this exception if the IHA discriminates by allowing interstate but not international betting on horseracing. The Appellate Body, therefore, conditioned its public morals exception on the United States ensuring that its federal laws, specifically the IHA, do not discriminate against foreign gambling suppliers.
机译：当前，美国与安提瓜岛之间因美国禁止跨境赌博服务而发生的贸易纠纷在许多方面都涉及道德问题。 2005年4月7日，WTO上诉机构广泛地推翻了先前的小组裁决，首次确认贸易限制措施免于WTO义务，因为它是“保护公共道德所必需的”。它认为，由于美国有必要禁止跨境赌博，以保护美国公众免受赌博之害，因此美国免于承担允许市场准入赌博服务的贸易义务。但是，上诉机构指出，如果有关联邦国际马球比赛的歧视是跨州而非国际马球比赛，则联邦法律关于州际马球比赛的州际赛马法案（IHA）可以否定该例外。因此，上诉机构将美国的公共道德例外作为条件，以确保其联邦法律（特别是IHA）不歧视外国赌博供应商。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号